Search Results for "Meeting Rules, 1959"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Section 35(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Gramsevak's Failure to Convene Meeting Within 15 Days Renders Motion Void.

The petitioner, Sow. Gangabai Vithal Bade, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Hadoli. Respondent Nos. 4 to 6 submitted a requisition for a no-confidenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Discriminatory Furlough Condition in Maharashtra Prisons Rules as Unconstitutional. Residence-based classification for furlough eligibility violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Chandradev @ Chandu S/o Pareshwar Rai and Satish S/o Ramchandra Ninapure, were convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions on Acceptance of Delegation Forms in Cooperative Society Elections. Petitioners Sought Mandamus to Include Delegate Names in Voters List for DCC Bank Election After Stay of ARCS Order Restoring Board.

The writ petitions were filed by two cooperative societies challenging the non-acceptance of their delegation forms for the election to the Kolar-Chik...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Election Notification for Co-operative Banks. Rule 3(2) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960 Held Directory, Not Mandatory.

The petitioners, various Primary Agricultural Credit Co-operative Societies, filed writ petitions challenging the election notification issued by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Collector's Order Setting Aside Sarpanch Election. Rules Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Held Mandatory, Violation Invalidates Election.

The petitioner, Pallavi Ashok Kate, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.08.2022 passed by the Collector, Osmanabad, which allowed a d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...