Search Results for "Malegaon"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to PFI Accused in UAP Act Case — No Prima Facie Case of Waging War Against Government. Allegations of conspiracy under Section 121-A IPC and Section 13(1)(b) UAP Act not made out as acts alleged fall under Sections 153-A, 153-B, 295-A IPC.

The Bombay High Court allowed three criminal appeals filed by accused nos. 2, 3, and 6 in a case arising from FIR No. 20/2021 registered by the Anti T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, who are family members, filed three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Free Studentship Scheme for Wards of Private School Employees. Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 mandates free education for children of teaching and non-teaching staff, and communication restricting benefit to one ward is quashed.

The petitioners, employees of private schools in Nanded, filed a writ petition seeking implementation of the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307 and 451 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and identification of accused was doubtful.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Chintaram Kadam, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for offences under Sections 451 (house tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in LPG Distributorship Termination Dispute. Clause 29 of Distributorship Agreement Allowed Termination Without Assigning Reasons, and Arbitrator's Findings Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s. Prasad Gas Agency, was appointed as a distributor of LPG (Bharat Gas) by the respondent, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Subhash Govinda Ambhore and Gajanan Pandhari Chibhade, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 376(2)(g) (gang ra...