Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Free Studentship Scheme for Wards of Private School Employees. Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 mandates free education for children of teaching and non-teaching staff, and communication restricting benefit to one ward is quashed.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, employees of private schools in Nanded, filed a writ petition seeking implementation of the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996, which provides free education to the wards of teaching and non-teaching staff in recognized private schools. They also challenged a communication dated 18.08.2018 issued by the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, which allegedly restricted the benefit to only one ward per employee. The petitioners argued that the resolution does not limit the number of children and that they had been paying fees under protest. The respondents, including the State and the school principals, contended that the benefit was limited to one child as per the communication. The court examined the Government Resolution and found no such restriction. It held that the communication dated 18.08.2018 was contrary to the policy and quashed it. The court directed the respondent schools to refund the fees collected from the petitioners for their wards within a specified period. The petition was allowed with costs.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Free Studentship Scheme - Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 - Implementation - The court considered the validity of a communication restricting the benefit of free education to only one ward of employees of private schools. Held that the Government Resolution does not impose any such restriction and the communication is contrary to the policy. (Paras 2-10)

B) Education Law - Refund of Fees - Unauthorized Collection - The court directed the respondent schools to refund the fees collected from the petitioners for their wards, as the free studentship scheme was applicable. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, being employees of private schools, are entitled to free education for their wards under the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996, and whether the communication dated 18.08.2018 restricting the benefit is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, quashed the communication dated 18.08.2018, and directed the respondent schools to refund the fees collected from the petitioners for their wards within a specified period.

Law Points

  • Free studentship scheme
  • Government Resolution
  • refund of fees
  • implementation of policy
  • private schools
  • education
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (10) 256

WRIT PETITION NO. 470 OF 2021

2023-11-08

Mangesh S. Patil, Shailesh P. Brahme

2023:BHC-AUG:24408-DB

Ms. Kavita S. Bhale, Shri S. B. Yawalkar, Shri S. R. Bagal h/f Shri B. N. Gadegaonkar

Namdeo S/o Janardhan Karad, Dnyaneshwar S/o Tukaram Sakhare, Santosh S/o Maruti Gore

The State of Maharashtra, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, The Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Nanded, The Principal, Little Scholar's Public School, The Principal, Shakuntal School for Excellence, The Principal, Dnyanbharti Vidyamandir, The Principal, Oxford The Global School, The Principal, Holy City Public School

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition seeking implementation of Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 for free education of wards of employees of private schools and refund of fees paid.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners seek directions to implement the free studentship scheme, refund of fees paid for their wards, and quashing of communication dated 18.08.2018.

Filing Reason

Petitioners, employees of private schools, were denied free education for their wards under the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 and were required to pay fees.

Issues

Whether the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 entitles the petitioners to free education for their wards without restriction on number of children. Whether the communication dated 18.08.2018 restricting the benefit to one ward is valid.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the Government Resolution does not limit the benefit to one child and that they have been paying fees under protest. Respondents contended that the benefit is limited to one child as per the communication dated 18.08.2018.

Ratio Decidendi

The Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 does not impose any restriction on the number of wards entitled to free education. The communication dated 18.08.2018 is contrary to the policy and is quashed. The schools are liable to refund fees collected in violation of the scheme.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners principally are seeking implementation of the Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996. By Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996, the State Government promulgated free studentship scheme for the wards studying in standards I to X.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed in 2021. It was heard finally at the admission stage with consent of parties. Judgment was pronounced on 08.11.2023.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Free Studentship Scheme for Wards of Private School Employees. Government Resolution dated 13.06.1996 mandates free education for children of teaching and non-teaching staff, and commun...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Essential Commodities Act Case — License Cancellation Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Licensee Denied Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses, Rendering Inquiry Void.