Search Results for "Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act 1999"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.

The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Proceedings Deemed Lapsed as Award Was Not Made Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration.

The petitioner, Haribhau Narayan Chikane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Child Rape and Murder Case. Judicial Confession and Last Seen Theory Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted as 'Rarest of Rare'.

The case involves the ghastly rape and murder of two children aged 10 and 7 years. On 29 October 2010, Mohanakrishnan picked up the children from outs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree of Specific Performance in Development Rights Dispute. Agreement for Sale of Development Rights Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Limitation or Registration Requirements.

The case involves a commercial appeal arising from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 10th March, 2003. The appellant, Samir Narain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy for Prevention of Farmer Suicides. Court holds that the State must provide ex-gratia assistance to families of farmers who committed suicide due to agricultural indebtedness, recognizing the constitutional duty under Article 21.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation initiated by a letter from the All India Bio Dynamic and Organic Farming Association to the Chie...