Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum in Gram Panchayat Reservation Case — State Cannot Alter Reservation After Election Process Begins. Corrigendum Issued After Publication of Final Reservation List and Commencement of Election Process Held Invalid Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, seven Gram Panchayats in Parli-Vaijnath taluka, Beed district, constituted under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order Invalidating No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Rules Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act Held Directory, Not Mandatory, and Substantial Compliance Sufficient.

The petitioner, Prajakta Prabhakar Kadu, the Up-Sarpanch of Gram-Panchayat Shedsai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Appellate Reversal of No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch under Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958. The Petition Raises Issue of Non-Service of No Confidence Motion Notice on Sarpanch Despite Participation in Meeting.

The writ petition arose from a dispute over the validity of a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Varkhedi Gram Panchayat under the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election on Ground of Underage Candidate. Court Holds That School Leaving Certificate Is Valid Proof of Age and Petitioner Failed to Prove Candidate Was Below 21 Years at Time of Nomination Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Santosh Vitthal Awate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grampanchayat Election Nomination Rejection Due to Bar Under Article 243-O(b) of Constitution. Writ Petition Held Not Maintainable as Remedy Lies Only Through Election Petition Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioner, Gazala Bi Saddam Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of her nominatio...