Search Results for "Goa Buildings Control Act"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Interpretation Of Manufacturing Process Under Factories Act, 1948 – Business Of Laundry Held To Constitute Manufacturing Process – Premises Deemed A Factory – Order Issuing Process Restored.

a. Definition of manufacturing process under Section 2(k) includes washing and cleaning for delivery and use – Laundry service falls squarely within...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Default Case — Eviction Decree Restored. Tenant's failure to pay rent for over six months constitutes wilful default under Section 22(2)(a) of the Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

The petitioners, landlords of a commercial premises, sought eviction of the respondent tenant on the ground of default in payment of rent under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order on Ground of No Service. Failure of Natural Justice and Invalid Service Under Section 32(4) of Goa, Daman and Diu Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the appellant, a tenant, against the judgment and order dated 13.08.2010 of a learned Single Judge ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case — Mushroom Farming Income Held Agricultural. Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed as Based on Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in mushroom farming, filed its income tax return for assessment yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Environment Protection Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Cognizance Error. The court held that the Magistrate failed to apply mind and sanction was not validly obtained, rendering the proceedings an abuse of process.

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.3 of 2012 registered ...