Search Results for "Execution Proceedings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Execution Proceedings"

6190 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6190 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Executing Court Order Dismissing Objections for Want of Objector Due to Death — Emphasizes That Objections Survive for Heirs to Pursue Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. The Court held that objections under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 do not abate upon the death of the objector and legal heirs can be substituted to continue the proceedings.

21 Dec 2011

The petitioners, legal heirs of the deceased judgment debtor Rajaram Dadasaheb Nimbalkar, challenged an order dated 24 June 2011 passed by the Learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Execution Order in Section 6 Specific Relief Act Suit — Bar Under Section 6(3) Does Not Apply to Execution Proceedings Under Order XXI CPC. Appeal Under Order XXI Rule 103 CPC Held Maintainable as Execution Order Is Not a Decree in the Suit.

27 Sep 2011

The appellant, an obstructionist, challenged a judgment and order dated 7 December 2009 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, which made absolute a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Breach of Consent Terms in Civil Suit — No Willful Disobedience Established as Execution Proceedings Already Initiated

7 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Amrish Arora, who was original defendant No.2 in Short Cause Suit Nos.272/2008 and 273/2008 filed in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Right to Argue in Execution Proceedings. Repeated Adjournments and Non-Compliance with Cost Order Justify Forfeiture Under Order 21 CPC.

27 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Robert Meghraj Wanjari, was the judgment debtor in Special Summary Suit No.1 of 2010, where a decree was passed against him. He filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Section 47 CPC Application in Arbitration Execution — Judgment Debtor Cannot Re-litigate Arbitral Award Validity in Execution Proceedings

8 Jun 2011

The petitioner, M/s Sira Constructions, was the judgment debtor in an execution proceeding arising from an arbitral award passed under the Arbitration...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Attachment of Property Before Judgment — Order XXI Rule 46 CPC Not Applicable to Original Suits, But Court Grants Relief Under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC. The court held that an application under Order XXI Rule 46 CPC is not maintainable in an original suit, but the plaintiff can seek attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC if the defendant intends to obstruct or delay execution.

2 Apr 2026

The appellant, Radiance Realty Developers India Limited, filed a suit against the respondent, M. Rekha, for recovery of Rs.41,42,871/- based on a cons...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Leave Petition by Third Party in Execution Proceedings — Third Party Has No Locus Standi to Challenge Execution Order. Petition for leave to file civil revision against execution order dismissed as not maintainable because petitioner was not a party to the decree or execution proceedings.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Nandhini Agro Research Centre, a partnership firm represented by its partner Sri Rupesh Anand, filed CMP No. 4793 of 2026 seeking...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Does Not Create a Charge on Property and That Sub Registrars Are Not Bound by Such Orders Unless Property Is Attached.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, D. Chandrasekaran, represented by his power agent A. Dakshnamoorthy, filed two contempt petitions. The first, Cont.P.No.1723 of 2025, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Civil Revision Petition as Settled Between Parties in Execution Proceedings. Parties Compromise During Pendency of Revision, Court Records Full Satisfaction of Decree.

18 Feb 2026

The case involves a Civil Revision Petition filed by Gokul Das Mundhra against M/s Tuscana Kryuptos Restaurants Private Limited under Article 227 of t...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)