Search Results for "Ex-parte Order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Ex-parte Order"

480 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Ex Parte Decree in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'ZITA' Infringed by Defendants' Identical Mark. Court holds that registration of assignment with Trademarks Registry is not a prerequisite for filing suit; plaintiff's title to mark established through assignment deeds.

30 Jun 2015

The plaintiff, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit against G.R.A.F. Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and Valence Health Care for infringement of its reg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Council to Challenge Ex-Parte Labour Award on Condition of Costs and Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication. The Court held that while the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for setting aside the ex-parte award, the matter was remanded to avoid miscarriage of justice in a public employment case, subject to payment of costs.

16 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Municipal Council, Sillod, challenged an ex-parte award dated 18/01/2012 passed by the Labour Court, Aurangabad in Reference (I.D.A.) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Cooperative Society Challenging Land Acquisition for Municipal Road. Land Reserved for Road in Development Plan Cannot Be Used for Other Purposes Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

20 Nov 2025

The appellant, Ambernath Sahakari Samudayik Shetki Society Limited, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the dismissal of its writ petition challengi...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Does Not Create a Charge on Property and That Sub Registrars Are Not Bound by Such Orders Unless Property Is Attached.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, D. Chandrasekaran, represented by his power agent A. Dakshnamoorthy, filed two contempt petitions. The first, Cont.P.No.1723 of 2025, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Restoration of Exparte Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Condition of 50% Deposit Set Aside. Industrial Court's conditional setting aside of exparte judgment under Section 50 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 modified to unconditional restoration due to lack of justification for deposit condition.

24 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Dileep Balkrishna Nevatia, challenged an order dated 05/04/2017 passed by the Member of the Industrial Court, Nagpur, which conditiona...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition, Sets Aside Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Restoration in Specific Performance Suit. Defendant Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Knowledge of Proceedings.

18 Sep 2012

The petitioner, Hemant Ganeshprasad Jaiswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 6.2.2006 against the respondent, Mur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

18 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Property Dispute Due to Abatement. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives on Record Leads to Abatement Under Order 22 CPC.

30 Dec 2020

The case pertains to a writ petition filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa concerning a property dispute among family members. The petitioners, inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Condonation of 959 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree — Sufficient Cause Shown by Defendant's Non-Service. Order VI Rule 14A CPC Requires Registered Address; Absence Thereof Justifies Delay.

3 Aug 2016

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original plaintiffs challenging the order of the lower appellate court dated 07.11.2015, w...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)