Search Results for "Development Plan road"

1633 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1633 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Order Protecting Open Spaces in JVPD Scheme. Layout Reservation of 1967 Prevails Over Development Plan of 1999 Under DCR.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court judgment that declared two plots in JVPD Scheme, Mumbai, as mandatory open spaces an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reservation Lapses Under Section 127 MRTP Act When Authority Fails to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court held that reservation of land under the Development Plan lapses under Section 127 of the MRTP Act if the Planning Authority fail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Corrigendum to Final Development Plan. Corrigendum Restoring Botanical Garden Reservation Upheld as Permissible Rectification of Error Without Fresh Notification Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Housilal Balchand Shah, owned land in survey no. 34 at Anand Valli, Nasik. In the draft development plan under the Maharashtra Regiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Reservation on Land Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to initiate acquisition proceedings within ten years from sanction of development plan results in lapsing of reservation under Section 127 of MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Saurabh R. Shah, owned land at Survey No.198, Hissa No.3/2, village Sandor, Vasai, Palghar, which was reserved for water bodies/20 met...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Notification for Pune Ring Road Project — Public Purpose and Compliance with Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Upheld. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shankar Dabhade and others, and Raghunath Sudam Dabhade and others, challenging a notification dated...