Search Results for "Baramati"

159 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 159 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Driver's Income Exceeds Threshold Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Under Section 163A Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Limit Prescribed Under Second Schedule.

The appellants, legal heirs of deceased Kailas Vithal Nanaware, filed a claim petition under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Arrest and Detention by Executive Magistrate in Chapter Proceedings. Petitioner's Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty Under Article 21 Violated as Order Under Section 122 CrPC Passed Without Proper Inquiry Under Section 111 CrPC.

The petitioner, Amol Bharat Khule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Proce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Injured Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole testimony of PW-2 was inconsistent with medical evidence and prosecution failed to prove motive.

The appellant, Milind Hanumant Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati for the murder of a 10-year-old boy, Prathamesh, and f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar v. The State of Maharashtra

The petitioner, Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Cognizable Offence Complaint - Mandatory Duty Under Section 154 CrPC. Police Cannot Refuse Registration of FIR When Complaint Discloses Cognizable Offence; Preliminary Inquiry Only in Exceptional Cases Limited to Two Days.

The petitioner, Smt. Vijaya Vasant Nikam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, complaini...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...