Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Arrest and Detention by Executive Magistrate in Chapter Proceedings. Petitioner's Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty Under Article 21 Violated as Order Under Section 122 CrPC Passed Without Proper Inquiry Under Section 111 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Amol Bharat Khule, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- from respondent nos. 2 and 3 for his alleged illegal arrest and detention. The petitioner owned agricultural land adjacent to Bhairavnath Sugar Company Ltd. in Osmanabad district. Polluted water from the sugar factory drained into his land, causing infertility. He requested the factory administration to stop the discharge, leading to two Non-Cognizable Reports (NCRs) being registered against him under Sections 504, 506, and 507 of the Indian Penal Code on 30.06.2020 and 24.05.2021. Based on these NCRs, the police submitted a Chapter Report No. 49 of 2021 under Section 107 of the CrPC before respondent no. 3, the Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate, on 25.05.2021, requesting an order for the petitioner to execute a bond of good behavior. The petitioner was produced before respondent no. 3, who passed an order under Section 122 of the CrPC, directing the petitioner to be detained in custody for 15 days. The petitioner was arrested and detained from 25.05.2021 to 08.06.2021. The petitioner contended that the order under Section 122 CrPC was passed without following the procedure under Sections 111 and 116 CrPC, and without any inquiry, thus violating his fundamental right under Article 21. The respondents argued that the order was valid and the petition was not maintainable. The court analyzed the provisions of Sections 107, 111, 116, and 122 CrPC and found that the Executive Magistrate had not conducted any preliminary inquiry under Section 111 CrPC, nor recorded satisfaction that immediate prevention was necessary. The court held that the order under Section 122 CrPC was without jurisdiction and illegal, and the detention violated Article 21. The court awarded compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the petitioner, to be paid by respondent no. 3 personally within four weeks, with liberty to recover the amount from the police officer who submitted the Chapter Report.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Illegal Arrest and Detention - Compensation for Violation of Fundamental Rights - Article 21, Constitution of India - Petitioner was arrested and detained by Executive Magistrate under Section 122 CrPC without proper inquiry under Section 111 CrPC, violating his right to life and personal liberty - Held that the detention was illegal and petitioner entitled to compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Paras 1-18).

B) Criminal Procedure Code - Chapter Proceedings - Sections 107, 111, 116, 122 CrPC, 1973 - Executive Magistrate passed order under Section 122 CrPC without conducting preliminary inquiry under Section 111 CrPC and without recording satisfaction that immediate prevention was necessary - Held that the order was without jurisdiction and illegal (Paras 7-14).

C) Constitutional Law - Right to Life and Personal Liberty - Article 21, Constitution of India - Illegal arrest and detention by State functionary amounts to violation of fundamental right - Court can award compensation in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 - Held that compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- be paid to petitioner by respondent no. 3 personally (Paras 15-18).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner was illegally arrested and detained by respondent no. 3 (Executive Magistrate) in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for such illegal detention.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, holding that the arrest and detention of the petitioner were illegal and in violation of Article 21. The court directed respondent no. 3 to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the petitioner within four weeks, with liberty to recover the amount from the police officer who submitted the Chapter Report.

Law Points

  • Illegal arrest
  • Compensation for violation of fundamental rights
  • Section 122 CrPC
  • Section 107 CrPC
  • Article 21 Constitution of India
  • Executive Magistrate powers
  • Chapter proceedings
  • Right to life and personal liberty
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-AUG:31915-DB

Criminal Writ Petition No. 731 of 2021

2025-11-20

Nitin B. Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil - Jadhav

2025:BHC-AUG:31915-DB

Mr. Vikram S. Undre, Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Mr. Sandip. R. Sapkal, Mr. V. K. Kotecha

Amol S/o Bharat Khule

The State of Maharashtra, The In-charge Investigation Officer, Police Station Ambi, Anilkumar Ramchandra Helkar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition seeking compensation for illegal arrest and detention.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- from respondent nos. 2 and 3 for illegal arrest and detention.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was arrested and detained by respondent no. 3 (Executive Magistrate) under Section 122 CrPC without proper inquiry, violating his fundamental right under Article 21.

Issues

Whether the arrest and detention of the petitioner under Section 122 CrPC was illegal and in violation of Article 21? Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for the illegal detention?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent no. 3 passed the order under Section 122 CrPC without conducting any inquiry under Section 111 CrPC, and without recording satisfaction that immediate prevention was necessary, making the detention illegal. Respondents argued that the order was passed in accordance with law and the petition was not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

An order under Section 122 CrPC for detention can only be passed after a proper inquiry under Section 111 CrPC and upon satisfaction that immediate prevention is necessary. Failure to do so renders the detention illegal and violative of Article 21, entitling the victim to compensation under Article 226.

Judgment Excerpts

The order under Section 122 of CrPC was passed without conducting any preliminary inquiry under Section 111 of CrPC and without recording satisfaction that immediate prevention was necessary. The detention of the petitioner from 25.05.2021 to 08.06.2021 was illegal and in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. We direct respondent no. 3 to pay compensation of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the petitioner within four weeks from today.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 731 of 2021 before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) under Article 226 and Section 482 CrPC seeking compensation for illegal arrest and detention. The court reserved judgment on October 13, 2025, and pronounced on November 20, 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 226
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 107, Section 111, Section 116, Section 122, Section 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Section 504, Section 506, Section 507
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Illegal Arrest and Detention by Executive Magistrate in Chapter Proceedings. Petitioner's Fundamental Right to Life and Liberty Under Article 21 Violated as Order Under Section 122 CrPC Passed Without Proper ...