Search Results for "Audit Officer"

1017 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1017 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme Benefit to Development Officer. Court holds that the Scheme's eligibility conditions are clear and the petitioner's application was rightly rejected as he did not meet the qualifying service requirement.

The petitioner, K.G.H. Dodhiya, joined the New India Assurance Company Limited as a Development Officer on 16 April 1977 and later became an Administr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KSAT Order Quashing Recovery of Pay Fixation Benefits from Commercial Tax Officers. Recovery of excess pay without fault of employee held impermissible under Karnataka Civil Services Rules.

The State of Karnataka and the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Karnataka State Administrative Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Permission to Lead Secondary Evidence in Absence of Proper Foundation. The court set aside the trial court's order granting permission to produce secondary evidence of audit report due to vague application and lack of affidavit.

The petitioner, accused no. 7 in Regular Criminal Case No. 337 of 2009 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nanded, challenged the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion Not Permissible; Notice Under Section 148 Quashed.

The petitioner, Hasmukh Estates Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...