Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay for Charitable Trust in Income Tax Exemption Case — Technical Defect in Form 10B Approval Not Fatal. The court held that the Commissioner should have liberally condoned the delay under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the trust had filed the audit report before the due date and the delay in approval was due to a technical glitch.

High Court: Gujarat High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Jain Dehrasar Upasraya Ane Sadharan, is a charitable trust registered under the Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950, engaged in running a Jain derasar and promoting Jainism for over 45 years. It is also registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2022-23 to 2026-27. For A.Y. 2021-22, the due date for filing the audit report in Form 10B was extended to 15.02.2022 and for filing the return of income to 15.03.2022 vide Circular No. 01/2022 dated 11.01.2022. The trust's auditor filed the audit report on 21.12.2021, and the return of income was filed on 28.01.2022 declaring total income of Rs. 1,86,570/- after claiming exemption under Section 11 amounting to Rs. 7,84,608/-. The audit report was accepted/approved by the trust on 29.03.2022. The return was processed under Section 143(1) on 10.08.2022 accepting the returned income. However, the Assessing Officer passed a suo-moto rectification order under Section 154 on 07.03.2023, disallowing the exemption claimed and determining total income at Rs. 9,71,176/-, raising a demand of Rs. 1,35,480/-. The reason for disallowance was that fresh registration under Section 12AB was not obtained. The trust filed an application for condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) on 16.03.2023, contending that the audit report was filed before the due date but there was a delay in approval due to a technical glitch. The respondent Commissioner rejected the application on 31.01.2024, stating that the delay was not properly explained. The trust then filed the present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution seeking quashing of the rejection order and direction to condone the delay and allow the exemption. The High Court held that the Commissioner ought to have considered the application liberally, as the trust had substantially complied with the requirements and the delay was minimal and technical. The court set aside the impugned order, condoned the delay, and directed the respondent to allow the claim of exemption under Section 11.

Headnote

A) Income Tax - Condonation of Delay - Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act, 1961 - Charitable Trust - The petitioner trust filed audit report in Form 10B before due date but approval was granted after due date due to technical glitch - Commissioner rejected condonation application on ground that delay was not explained - Court held that the Commissioner ought to have considered the application liberally as the trust had complied with substantive requirements and the delay was minimal and technical - Held that the rejection was unsustainable and the delay deserves to be condoned (Paras 1-7).

B) Income Tax - Exemption under Section 11 - Form 10B - Section 12A, Section 12AB Income Tax Act, 1961 - The trust had obtained registration under Section 12A for A.Y. 2022-23 to 2026-27 and had filed audit report on time - The Assessing Officer disallowed exemption under Section 11 on ground that fresh registration under Section 12AB was not obtained - Court noted that the trust had applied for condonation and the defect was curable - Held that once delay is condoned, the exemption under Section 11 should be allowed (Paras 4-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondent Commissioner was justified in rejecting the petitioner's application for condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for filing Form 10B approval for A.Y. 2021-22, and whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 31.01.2024, condoned the delay in filing Form 10B approval, and directed the respondent to allow the claim of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Law Points

  • Condonation of delay
  • Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act
  • 1961
  • Charitable trust exemption
  • Form 10B
  • Section 11
  • Section 12A
  • Section 12AB
  • Section 154
  • Liberal approach
  • Technical defect
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:GUJHC:18118-DB

R/Special Civil Application No. 9992 of 2024

2026-03-09

Honourable Mr. Justice A.S. Supehia, Honourable Mr. Justice Pranav Trivedi

2026:GUJHC:18118-DB

Mr. Hardik V. Vora for the Petitioner, Mr. Aman Mir for the Respondent

Shri Jain Dehrasar Upasraya Ane Sadharan

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution challenging rejection of application for condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 31.01.2024 rejecting condonation of delay and direction to condone delay and allow exemption under Section 11 of the Act.

Filing Reason

The respondent Commissioner rejected the petitioner's application for condonation of delay in filing Form 10B approval, leading to disallowance of exemption under Section 11.

Previous Decisions

The Assessing Officer passed a suo-moto rectification order under Section 154 on 07.03.2023 disallowing exemption; the Commissioner rejected the condonation application on 31.01.2024.

Issues

Whether the rejection of condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) was justified. Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption under Section 11 of the Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the audit report was filed before due date and delay in approval was due to technical glitch; the Commissioner ought to have condoned the delay liberally. Respondent contended that the delay was not properly explained and the application was rightly rejected.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while considering an application under Section 119(2)(b) for condonation of delay, the authority must adopt a liberal approach, especially when the delay is minimal and technical, and the applicant has substantially complied with the requirements. The rejection on the ground that the delay was not explained is unsustainable when the facts show that the audit report was filed before the due date and the delay in approval was due to a technical glitch.

Judgment Excerpts

Since a short issue is involved, the matter is taken up for final hearing today. The present writ petition is filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of Certiorari... The brief facts of the case is that the petitioner is a charitable Trust registered under Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950. For the A.Y 2021-22, the due date of filing of the audit report in Form 10B was extended upto 15.02.2022... Thereafter, the Assessing Officer passed suo-moto rectification order under Section 154 of the Act on 07.03.2023... On receipt of the order, the petitioner Trust filed and application for condonation of delay under Section 119 of the Act on 16.03.2023... The respondent rejected the application on 31.01.2024.

Procedural History

The petitioner trust filed its audit report and return for A.Y. 2021-22 within extended due dates. The return was processed under Section 143(1) accepting the income. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed a suo-moto rectification order under Section 154 on 07.03.2023 disallowing exemption. The trust filed an application for condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) on 16.03.2023, which was rejected by the Commissioner on 31.01.2024. The trust then filed the present writ petition on 09.03.2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 11, Section 12A, Section 12AB, Section 119(2)(b), Section 143(1), Section 154
  • Constitution of India: Article 226, Article 227
  • Gujarat Public Trusts Act, 1950:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Allows Condonation of Delay for Charitable Trust in Income Tax Exemption Case — Technical Defect in Form 10B Approval Not Fatal. The court held that the Commissioner should have liberally condoned the delay under Section 119(2)(b...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of n...