Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Agricultural Produce Marketing"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Retrospective Withdrawal of Export Incentive Scheme. Retrospective Cancellation of Transport and Marketing Assistance Scheme Violates Legitimate Expectation and Promissory Estoppel, Unreasonable Classification Under Article 14.

5 Feb 2026

The petitioners, exporters of agricultural products, were beneficiaries of the Transport and Marketing Assistance (TMA) Scheme introduced by the Minis...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Agricultural Produce Market Committees in Service Tax Case on Exemption Grounds. The court upheld service tax liability for renting immovable property pre-01.07.2012, ruling that the activity was not a statutory duty under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 and exemption under Circular No.89/7/2006 does not apply.

23 Feb 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a judgment delivered by Justice M.R. Shah, addressed a group of appeals filed by various Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti (Agri...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Agricultural Marketing Board Rules for Preferential Allotment to Displaced Dealers. Conditions of Three Years Licensing and Minimum Turnover of Rs.5 Lakhs Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14.

16 Oct 2019

The case involves appeals against judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the validity and interpretation of the Punjab State Agricu...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petition for Continuation of APMC Elections from Adjourned Stage — Returning Officer Directed to Proceed with Election for Chairman and Vice Chairman Without Altering Electoral Roll. Election Process Once Commenced Must Be Completed Without Interruption Under Section 42(1) of Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation and Development) Act, 1966.

22 Nov 2018

The petitioners, who were the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Channapatna Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), had been elected for a pe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging APMC Election Nomination for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioner, Not Being a Candidate or Voter, Cannot Challenge Acceptance of Nomination Under Karnataka APMC Rules.

22 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Sri Ravikumar H.P., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Cotton Federation in Market Fees Dispute — State Procurement Agency Held Liable to Pay Market and Supervision Fees Under APMC Act. The Court ruled that the appellant, acting as a government agent for cotton procurement, is a 'trader' under Section 2(1) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 and must pay fees on purchases from the market area.

11 Jan 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Divisional Manager and Sub Divisional Manager of the Maharashtra State Co-operative Cotton Grow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders of District Deputy Registrar in Election Nomination Dispute. Requirement of Declaration Under Rule 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Held Mandatory.

29 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Gyanba s/o Trimbakrao Shirale, challenged the orders of the District Deputy Registrar, Parbhani, which allowed appeals filed by respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Panchayat Samiti Member's Nomination to Market Committee Over Chairman's Claim — Rule 40A of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Cannot Override Section 13(1)(d) of the Act. The court held that the Panchayat Samiti's resolution electing a member as its representative under Section 13(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 is valid and cannot be overridden by Rule 40A of the Rules.

16 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajeshri Arun Munghate, a member of the Panchayat Samiti, Gadchiroli, challenged an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperativ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs State to Formulate Comprehensive Policy for Prevention of Farmer Suicides. Court holds that the State must provide ex-gratia assistance to families of farmers who committed suicide due to agricultural indebtedness, recognizing the constitutional duty under Article 21.

5 May 2006

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation initiated by a letter from the All India Bio Dynamic and Organic Farming Association to the Chie...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)