Search Results for "1894"

1738 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1738 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Due to Lapse Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Land Acquisition Proceedings Deemed Lapsed as Award Was Not Made Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration.

The petitioner, Haribhau Narayan Chikane, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the land acquisition award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Issue Notification Giving Effect to Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Must Be Implemented by Issuing Appropriate Notification.

The petitioner, Vishnudev Coop. Hsg. Society, a registered cooperative society, was the owner of land admeasuring 10H 33R forming part of Survey No.21...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim as Time-Barred Due to 37-Year Delay. Challenge to Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Rejected for Unexplained Laches.

The petitioners, Babasaheb Eknath Wakchaure, Sunil Namdeo Wakchaure, and Balasaheb Gangadhar Wakchaure, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Award in Land Acquisition Appeal Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Addressed Claims for Severance and Injurious Affection, Upholding Valuation Principles and Evidentiary Standards for Loss Determination.

The dispute arose from the acquisition of land by the Government of Maharashtra for the BHIMA (Ujjani) Irrigation Project, which affected a trolley li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Quash Land Reservations in Development Plan for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years Under Section 127 of MRTP Act. Reservation for MSEB extension and school/playground lapsed due to failure to acquire land within statutory period.

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Reservations in Development Plan Under MRTP Act. Reservations for MSEB Extension and School/Playground Quashed as Not Acquired Within 10 Years, Land Deemed De-reserved.

The petitioner, Vikramsinh Jaysingrao Ghatge, owned land bearing R.S.No.247/2/1 admeasuring 3 hectares at Kagal, District Kolhapur. The Government of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Occupancy Class-II to Class-I Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Holds That Section 44 of the Code Does Not Bar Such Conversion for Lands Acquired Under Part VII of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Ananta Landmarks Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order/communicat...