Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Land Acquisition Writ Petition. The Court considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 1913 OF 2016

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 108

Writ Petition No. 1913 of 2016

2025-04-25

M. S. Sonak, Jitendra Jain

2025:BHC-AS:20387-DB

V. S. Talkute (Petitioner), Savina R. Crasto (Respondents)

Shri Nathyaba Jagannath Sonwalkar

State of Maharashtra through its Revenue and Rehabilitation Department; The Collector, Satara; The Deputy Collector and Special Land Acquisition Officer (Acquisition) No. 21, Satara; The Deputy Collector (Rehabilitation), Satara

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging land acquisition and/or seeking rehabilitation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 or Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Examines Development Authority's Revision of Estimated Flat Costs in Hire-Purchase Scheme; High Court's Direction to Deliver Flats at 1980 Prices Under Challenge. Court Reiterates That Estimated Cost in Brochure Is Not Final and Allotte...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Family Settlement Mutation Entry Not Attracting Criminal Offences Under IPC Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 r/w 34.