Search Results for "share control"

1566 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1566 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Expulsion of Club Member — Expulsion Upheld as Valid and Not Violative of Natural Justice. Member's Defamatory Conduct and Misconduct Justified Expulsion Under Club Bye-laws.

The Plaintiff, Jaisingh Choraria, a member of The National Sports Club of India since 1989, filed a suit challenging his expulsion from the Club. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Ganja Possession Under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Judgment Sentencing the Accused to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in NDPS Special Case No. 24 of 2017, whereby the appellant was convicted f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet.

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Culpability for BMW Hit-and-Run: State Appeals Against High Court's Reduction of Conviction from Section 304 Part II to Section 304A IPC. The Core Issue is Whether the Accused Had Knowledge of Likely Death to Attract the Graver Offence.

The case arose from a fatal motor accident involving a BMW car driven by the respondent, Sanjeev Nanda, on the night of 9/10 January 1999 in New Delhi...