High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Ganja Possession Under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Judgment Sentencing the Accused to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in NDPS Special Case No. 24 of 2017, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The trial court sentenced the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000 with a default stipulation of simple imprisonment for three months. According to the prosecution case, on 2 February 2017, the appellant was found travelling in the Vishakhapatnam-Nijamuddin Express with contraband ganja in his bag. PSI Bose of the Railway Protection Force, Nagpur, submitted a letter to PSI Datta Pendke, the night duty officer at the Railway Police Station, Nagpur, leading to a raid and interception of the appellant. The RPF officers offered the appellant the option of being searched before a gazetted officer. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act and imposed the sentence. The appellant challenged this conviction and sentence before the High Court, contending that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and that there were procedural lapses in the search and seizure. The High Court heard the matter on 2 April 2025 and delivered judgment on 23 April 2025.

Issue of Consideration

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.238 OF 2023N

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 192

Criminal Appeal No. 238 of 2023

2025-04-23

Urmila Joshi-Phalke

2025:BHC-NAG:4210

Naman Bhangde, S.S. Dhote

Dhanesh Puri Guru Prem Puri

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for illegal possession of ganja.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

The appellant was convicted under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment and fine, prompting the appeal.

Previous Decisions

The Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur, in NDPS Special Case No. 24/2017, convicted the appellant for the offence under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs. 25,000.

Judgment Excerpts

By this appeal, the appellant (accused) has challenged judgment and order dated 17.3.2023 passed by learned Special Judge (NDPS Court), Nagpur. the accused is convicted for offence under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine Rs.25000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 months. The search was offered by the RPF Officers to the accused and his right to get himself searched before gazetted officer was also

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellant on 17 March 2023 in NDPS Special Case No. 24/2017. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 238 of 2023 before the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur. The appeal was heard on 2 April 2025 and judgment was pronounced on 23 April 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: 20(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Adjudicates Criminal Appeal Against Conviction for Ganja Possession Under Section 20(b) of the NDPS Act. Appeal Challenges the Trial Court's Judgment Sentencing the Accused to Three Years Rigorous Imprisonment and Fine.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes University Order Derecognizing Ph.D Guide for Violation of Natural Justice — Derecognition of Research Guide Without Hearing Held Invalid Under Ph.D Regulations, 2010.