Search Results for "monetary consideration"

1768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.3 in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Benefit of Doubt — Conviction Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The revision petition was filed by accused No.3, Krishna Veni, challenging her conviction under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with Section 34 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.3 in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The petitioner, Krishna Veni, was accused No.3 in C.C. No.405/2005 before the JMFC Court, Aurad-B, for offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 46...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-Execution Challenge to COFEPOSA Detention Order for Lack of Grounds Under Alka Subhash Gadia Criteria. Petitioner's Argument That Detention Was for Wrong Purpose Rejected as Activities Constituted Smuggling, Not Mere Abetment.

The petitioner, Suresh Kumar U. Jain @ Sanjay Srinath Rana, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Builder/Promoter in Summary Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Defendant's Failure to File Reply to Summons for Judgment Leads to Decree for Claimed Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries, for recovery of alleged m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Builder/Promoter entitled to recover proportionate outgoings from purchaser based on contractual clause in agreement for sale.

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries through its proprietor Mr....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review of judgment dated 21.10.2010 in Writ Petition No.711/2010 rejected as applicants sought re-argument of merits, not review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The applicants, tenants Shrichand s/o Rochaldas Khemani and Kawarlal s/o Rochaldas Khemani, filed a review application before the Bombay High Court, N...