Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "disputed correspondence"

1183 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1183 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Claim for Overtime Wages by Timekeepers in Railway Workshop under Factories Act read with Bombay Shops and Establishments Act. The Court Held that Section 70 of the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948, by its Non-Obstante Clause, Extends Overtime Wage Protection to All Factory Employees, Not Just 'Workers' under Section 2(1) of the Factories Act, 1948.

8 May 1959

The dispute arose when timekeepers employed in the time office of the Central Railway Workshop and Factory, Parel, Bombay, filed applications before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.

13 Feb 2019

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

13 Feb 2019

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Claim Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Testamentary Succession Bars Intestate Right. Property Devolution by Will Excludes Statutory Right of Pre-emption as Section 22 Applies Only to Intestate Property.

25 Oct 2024

The case involves a dispute over a suit property (Plot No.21, Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur) originally purchased by late Kashinath Subhedar in the name of his ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Unlawful Subletting Case — Tenant Failed to Prove Business Activity and Exclusive Possession. The court upheld the Appellate Bench's finding that the tenant had unlawfully sublet the suit premises to a third party, drawing inference from lack of business documents and exclusive possession by the sublessee.

20 Dec 2024

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Santosh Anant Sabale, the legal heir of the original tenant Anant Krishna Sabale, challenging ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Directs Collector to Determine Rent/Damages for Pre-Notification Submergence Period. Interest under Section 34 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 cannot be awarded from date prior to Section 4 notification; claimant entitled to rent/damages for period of dispossession before acquisition.

17 Jan 2020

The appellant, Chanabasappa, owned land that was submerged in 1991 due to the raising of the height of a dam under the Malprabha Reservoir Project in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit — Limitation Period for Suit by Electricity Board Governed by Article 113 of Limitation Act, 1963, Not Article 14. Suit for recovery of arrears of electricity charges filed within three years of demand notice held within limitation; interest rate reduced from 18% to 12% p.a.

23 Sep 2010

The appeal was filed by M/s. G.T. Iron & Steel Works (original defendants) against the judgment and decree dated 15th June 2002 passed by the Civil Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Price of Goods — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Authority to Sue, Limitation, and Replacement Goods. The court held that the defendant's defences raised triable issues under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, warranting unconditional leave to defend.

31 Aug 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Bombay Trading Co., a partnership firm manufacturing Ayurvedic products, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M/s. Jai Sant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Recall of Interim Order in Arbitration Dispute Over Termination of Concession Agreement — Petitioner Granted Relief to Appoint Independent Arbitrator. The Court held that an ex parte interim order passed without hearing the Petitioner and in ignorance of bias objection to the named arbitrator must be recalled, and the matter remitted for fresh consideration under Section 9 and Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Sep 2012

The Petitioner, M/s. Nagpur Sical Gupta Road Terminal Limited, a joint venture company, entered into a Concession Agreement dated 20 April 2007 with t...

67 68 69 70 71

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)