Bombay High Court Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Occupation of Godowns at Sassoon Dock. The Cases Involve Disputes Between Port Authority, State Fisheries Corporation, and Multiple Private Occupants.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "company secretary"
3387 result(s) found
Found 3387 result(s)
High Court
High Court Quashes Pre-Execution Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Violation of Statutory Safeguards. Order Passed Under Section 3(i) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 Set Aside Because No Steps Were Taken to Serve the Order or Grounds and Material.
30 Sep 2013The petitioner, a businessman and proprietor of J.J. Enterprises engaged in importing mobile accessories, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...
- 28
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Pre-Execution Challenge to Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA; Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Grounds for Interference are Limited to Five Exhaustive Grounds as per Gadia’s Case. Court Rejects Request to Allow Fresh Representation Under Section 11 When Prior Representation Already Rejected, Holding that It Cannot Direct Government to Review Its Decision.
5 Jan 2011(1) Background: Three criminal writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of detention orders passed un...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.
3 Mar 2023The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...
- 185
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.
29 Nov 2021The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...
- 438
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.
16 Oct 2018The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...
- 85
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Filed Against Transfer Order as Petitioner Lacked Eligibility Under Cadre and Recruitment Rules. Strict Compliance with Karnataka Minorities Welfare Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2010 Required for Appointment as Director, and Transfer Without Vacancy Constitutes Legal Malafide.
31 May 2022The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dat...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Challenge to Royalty Rules Under MMDR Act. Petitioners Argue Notification and Amended Rule 64D Exceed Section 9(3) Powers.
8 May 2013These writ petitions arose out of challenges by various mining leaseholders in Goa to the notification dated 13 August 2009, the amendment to Rule 64D...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Commercial Appeal Against Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC. The Appeal Centres on Whether Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Mandates Pre-Institution Mediation and Whether the Single Judge Correctly Required Deposit of the Suit Amount.
1 Oct 2021The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit filed by the respondent against the appellant for recovery of Rs.5.54 crores with accrued interest. T...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.
13 Nov 2024The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...
- 928
