Search Results for "beneficiary hearing"

746 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 746 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Irrigation Department Against Enhanced Compensation Award. Court Upholds Reference Court's Determination of Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for Agricultural Land Acquired for Irrigation Project.

The petitioner, the Executive Engineer of the Irrigation Department, Zilla Parishad, Latur, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and award o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Environmental Clearance for Resort Construction in CRZ Area Subject to Conditions — Public Trust Doctrine and Precautionary Principle Applied to Protect Coastal Ecology and Local Livelihoods.

The judgment arises from a Public Interest Litigation and connected writ petitions challenging the environmental clearance granted to M/s. Leading Hot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Reduces Mesne Profits Interest Rate. Court holds that interest on mesne profits should be at 6% per annum under Section 34 CPC, not 18% as awarded by trial court.

The appellant, Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 by the trial c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Freedom Fighter Pension for Alleged Participation in Quit India Movement. Petitioners failed to provide contemporaneous documentary evidence of participation in freedom struggle as required under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 14 individuals seeking freedom fighter pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes CIDCO Stop-Work Notice in 12.5% Scheme Plot Dispute. Petitioner's Title from Original Owner Upheld Over Trust Claim Under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Deepak Valji Karia and M/s. Ambedeep Enterprises, challenged a stop-work notice dated 6 May 2016 issued by CIDCO (Respondent Nos. 2-4)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Rejection of Plaint for Non-Payment of Court Fee in Commercial Suits. Court Holds That Order VII Rule 11 CPC Applies and Failure to Pay Court Fee Within Time Leads to Rejection.

The case involves a batch of original side appeals filed against the common order of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court rejecting the pla...