Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Scheme Due to Delay and Laches. Acquisition Proceedings Initiated in 1969 and Completed in 1986 Cannot Be Challenged After 14 Years Without Justification.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR
  • 51
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute relates to the acquisition of land bearing field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3, 155, 156 and 156/1, admeasuring about 10.10 acres, situated at Mouza Jaitala, Nagpur. The Nagpur Improvement Trust (NIT) published a notification dated 10-4-1969 under Section 39 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 (equivalent to Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894) for acquisition of 790.56 acres for the Shivangaon-Jaitala Street Scheme. A declaration under Section 45 of the NIT Act (equivalent to Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act) was published on 26-9-1974. The award was passed on 29-8-1986 and 7-10-1986. The petitioners, claiming to be owners of the land, filed the present writ petition in 2000 challenging the acquisition. The petitioners conceded that the dispute regarding Survey No.147/2 does not survive. The court framed the issue of whether the petition is barred by delay and laches. The petitioners argued that the declaration under Section 45 was not published in the Official Gazette as required, and that the acquisition is vitiated. The respondents contended that the petition is highly belated and that the declaration was duly published. The court examined the record and found that the declaration was published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette on 26-9-1974. The court held that the challenge after 14 years from the award is barred by delay and laches, and the petitioners failed to explain the delay. The court also noted that the petitioners had an alternative remedy of filing a reference under Section 44 of the NIT Act for enhancement of compensation, which they did not avail. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Delay and Laches - Challenge to Acquisition After 14 Years - The petitioners challenged the acquisition of their land initiated in 1969 and completed in 1986, filing the petition in 2000. The court held that the challenge is barred by delay and laches, as the petitioners failed to explain the inordinate delay. (Paras 1-10)

B) Land Acquisition - Publication of Declaration - Section 45 of Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - The petitioners argued that the declaration under Section 45 was not published in the Official Gazette as required. The court examined the record and found that the declaration was indeed published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette on 26th September 1974, and thus the contention was rejected. (Paras 11-15)

C) Land Acquisition - Alternative Remedy - Section 44 of Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - The court noted that the petitioners had an alternative remedy of filing a reference under Section 44 of the NIT Act for enhancement of compensation, which they did not avail. The petition was dismissed on this ground as well. (Para 16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners can challenge the land acquisition proceedings after a delay of 14 years from the passing of the award, and whether the acquisition is vitiated due to non-compliance with the requirement of publication of declaration under Section 45 of the NIT Act in the Official Gazette.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Delay and laches
  • Land acquisition
  • Section 39 of Nagpur Improvement Trust Act
  • 1936
  • Section 45 of Nagpur Improvement Trust Act
  • Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
  • Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 170

Writ Petition No. 2002 of 2000

2017-08-11

R. K. Deshpande, Mrs. Swapna Joshi

Shri Anand Parchure for Petitioners, Shri V.P. Maldhure for Respondent No.1, Shri G.A. Kunte for Respondent No.2 and 3, Shri S.Y. Deopujari for Respondent No.4

Baburao Kashinath Saratkar (dead) through L.Rs. and others

State of Maharashtra, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Special Land Acquisition Officer, Maharashtra State Airport Development Corporation

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the acquisition of their land and for restoration of possession

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed that the acquisition was illegal due to non-publication of declaration under Section 45 of the NIT Act in the Official Gazette

Previous Decisions

Award was passed on 29-8-1986 and 7-10-1986; petition filed in 2000

Issues

Whether the petition is barred by delay and laches? Whether the declaration under Section 45 of the NIT Act was published in the Official Gazette?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the declaration under Section 45 was not published in the Official Gazette, rendering the acquisition invalid. Respondents contended that the petition is highly belated and the declaration was duly published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette on 26-9-1974.

Ratio Decidendi

A challenge to land acquisition proceedings after a delay of 14 years from the passing of the award is barred by delay and laches, especially when the petitioners failed to explain the delay. Additionally, the declaration under Section 45 of the NIT Act was duly published in the Official Gazette, and the petitioners had an alternative remedy under Section 44 of the NIT Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The dispute in the present petition relates to field Survey Nos.147/2, 153, 154/1, 2 and 3 as well as 155, 156 and 156/1, totally admeasuring about 10.10 acres situated at MouzaJaitala, Ward No.15, Tahsil and District Nagpur. The respondent No.2Nagpur Improvement Trust published a notification dated 1041969 under Section 39 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 for acquisition 790.56 acres of land located at MouzaJaitala for the purposes of ShivangaonJaitala Street Scheme. The declaration was published under Section 45 of the said Act on 16/2691974. The award was passed on 2981986 and 7101986 in respect of different survey numbers. The petitioners have conceded to the position that the dispute in respect of the field Survey No.147/2 does not at all survive and hence they do not want to press the relief in respect of the said survey number.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 39 of NIT Act issued on 10-4-1969. Declaration under Section 45 published on 26-9-1974. Award passed on 29-8-1986 and 7-10-1986. Writ Petition filed in 2000. Judgment reserved on 28-7-2017 and pronounced on 11-8-2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936: 39, 44, 45
  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: 4, 6
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Cancels Bail Granted to Accused in NDPS Act False Implication Case — Complainant's Application Allowed Due to Serious Allegations of Conspiracy and Tampering of Evidence
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Petition Seeking Mandamus for Survey and Demarcation of Land Based on Pending Application. The Court Directs Survey Within Twelve Weeks Considering Petitioner's Possession and Pending Civil Suit.