Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Reduces Mesne Profits Interest Rate. Court holds that interest on mesne profits should be at 6% per annum under Section 34 CPC, not 18% as awarded by trial court.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 125
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 by the trial court. The respondent, Damodar Mangalji & Co. Ltd., had filed the suit for delivery of possession and mesne profits in respect of an area of 24218 square metres of property surveyed under Nos. 15 and 16 of Village Kotombi. The trial court partly decreed the suit, directing the appellant to hand over vacant possession and pay mesne profits at Rs.10,000/- per year from 01.01.1995 until delivery of possession, with interest at 18% per annum, and also granted a permanent injunction restraining the appellant from using the said area. The appellant contended that the rate of interest on mesne profits was excessive and should be reduced. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the mesne profits were not quantified at the time of decree and the contractual rate of interest was not applicable. The court reduced the interest rate from 18% per annum to 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, while confirming the rest of the decree. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Mesne Profits - Interest Rate - Section 2(12) CPC, Section 34 CPC - The court considered whether the rate of interest on mesne profits should be 18% per annum as awarded by the trial court. The High Court held that the interest rate should be reduced to 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization, as the mesne profits were not quantified at the time of decree and the contractual rate of interest was not applicable. (Paras 5-8)

B) Property Law - Lease - Sub-lease - Perpetual Lease - The dispute involved a perpetual lease of 22,250 sq m executed on 16.12.1974 and a sub-lease of approximately 25,000 sq m for five years with renewals. The sub-lease expired by efflux of time in 1994, leading to the suit for possession and mesne profits. (Paras 3-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in awarding mesne profits at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per year with interest at 18% per annum from 01.01.1995 until delivery of possession.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The judgment and decree of the trial court is modified to the extent that the interest on mesne profits shall be at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization instead of 18% per annum. The rest of the decree is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Mesne profits
  • Lease
  • Sub-lease
  • Perpetual lease
  • Interest rate
  • Section 2(12) CPC
  • Section 34 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (03) 223

First Appeal No. 116 of 2009

2017-03-21

F. M. Reis

2017:BHC-GOA:803

Mr. J. E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Mr. E. Dias, Mr. V. Braganza, Ms. Sujai Joshi and Mr. J. Dias, Advocates for the appellant; Mr. S. R. Rivonkar and Mr. Sagar Rivonkar, Advocates for the respondent

Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Damodar Mangalji & Co. Ltd.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal against judgment and decree in a suit for possession and mesne profits.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought reduction of interest rate on mesne profits from 18% per annum to a lower rate.

Filing Reason

Appellant challenged the trial court's award of interest at 18% per annum on mesne profits.

Previous Decisions

Trial court partly decreed the suit, directing possession and mesne profits at Rs.10,000/- per year with 18% interest from 01.01.1995.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in awarding interest at 18% per annum on mesne profits.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the interest rate of 18% per annum was excessive and should be reduced. Respondent supported the trial court's award.

Ratio Decidendi

Mesne profits are not quantified at the time of decree; hence, the contractual rate of interest is not applicable. The court has discretion under Section 34 CPC to award interest at a reasonable rate, which in this case is 6% per annum.

Judgment Excerpts

The above appeal challenges the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 whereby the suit filed by the respondent for delivery of possession and mesne profits came to be partly decreed... The appellant were also directed to pay to the respondent mesne profits calculated at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per year from 01.01.1995 until delivery of vacant possession... with interest at the rate of 18% per annum.

Procedural History

The respondent filed Special Civil Suit No.62/1996 for possession and mesne profits. The trial court partly decreed the suit on 16.04.2009. The appellant filed First Appeal No. 116 of 2009 before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the interest rate on mesne profits.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC): Section 2(12), Section 34
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Section 311 CrPC Application for Summoning Defence Witnesses — Emphasizes Wide Discretion to Secure Just Decision. The court set aside the Trial Court's order and allowed the application subjec...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge in NDPS Case — Possession of Narcotic Drug Sufficient for Prima Facie Case. Court held that at the stage of framing of charge, the court is not required to weigh the evidence metic...