Search Results for "Termination Appeal"

3282 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3282 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Probationary Police Sub-Inspectors Challenging Stigmatic Termination Without Inquiry. Termination orders set aside as violative of Article 311(2) and Maharashtra Police (Probation) Rules, 1960, with direction for reinstatement.

The petitioners, 21 individuals, were appointed as Police Sub-Inspectors in the Maharashtra Police Force on a probationary basis. During their probati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Teacher in Illegal Termination Case. Appointment Without Approval Renders Reinstatement Inappropriate; Section 11(2)(e) of MEPS Act Applied for Six Months' Salary Compensation.

The petitioner, Shri Charudatta Ramchandra Bagadi, was employed as a teacher at Bramhaling Vidyalaya Hajgoli, a school run by Respondent No.1 (Shetkar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Approval for Shikshan Sevak Appointment. Court Directs School Tribunal to Decide Preliminary Issues Including Validity of Approval in Pending Appeal Under MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Ku. Arti d/o Vithalrao Warkhede, was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak (teacher) in Sayja Mohan Vidyalaya, Sarul, which is run by responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Share Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. MOU for Sale of Shares Held Not Enforceable as Plaintiff Did Not Show Financial Capacity to Pay Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time.

The appellants, plaintiffs in the suit, filed an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment of the trial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Modification of Reinstatement Award in Industrial Dispute - Employee's Status as Workman Confirmed. Compensation of Rs.75,000 in lieu of reinstatement and back wages held just and proper due to long lapse of time and acceptance of notice pay.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from an industrial dispute between Lenin Kumar Ray (employee) and M/s. Express Publications (Madurai) Ltd....