Search Results for "revision under Article 227"

1357 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1357 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Stay of Execution Proceedings in Possession Suit — Order 21 Rule 29 CPC Cannot Be Invoked After Decree Is Passed. Execution Court Erred in Staying Execution Based on Subsequent Suit Filed by Judgment Debtor After Decree.

The petitioners (decree holders) obtained a decree for possession in O.S. No. 79/2003 (originally O.S. No. 3/1971) against the respondent (judgment de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Auction Purchaser in SARFAESI Act Case — High Court Erred in Entertaining Writ Petition Despite Alternative Remedy. Restoration of Securitization Application After Full Payment and Sale Certificate Issuance Held Improper.

The appeal arises from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad, which set aside the DRT's order dismi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Due to Settlement — Proceedings under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Quashed as Parties Resolve Differences Amicably.

The applicants, who were the original accused in a criminal case, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examined Victim Compensation Claim Under Section 357A CrPC in Corrosive Substance Burn Case. Court Considered Whether Burn Victim Could Be Treated at Par with Acid Attack Victims Under Manodhairya Compensation Scheme and State's Duty to Provide Rehabilitation.

The petitioner, a resident of Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the State of Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition Challenging Reversal of Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act. Appellate court erred in setting aside maintenance without considering wife's entitlement under Section 20 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Madhura Milind Gadgil, married respondent No.1, Milind Neelkant Gadgil, on 26 May 1990. A daughter was born on 5 July 1991. In 1997, t...