High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular Second Appeals in Partition Dispute. Appellants Challenge First Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Decrees Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
10 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "grounds not pressed"
2074 result(s) found
Found 2074 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Quashing of Charge Sheet in Disproportionate Assets Case. Re-employment of Retired Police Officer as Joint Director Valid Under Article 162 of Constitution.
6 Dec 2019The Supreme Court dealt with appeals against the High Court's order quashing a charge sheet in a disproportionate assets case under the Prevention of ...
- 190
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Handling Services. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that allegations of fraud were not serious enough to render dispute non-arbitrable and rejects challenge to award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Nov 2023The case involves a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Maharashtra Power Generation Company Ltd. (Petitioner) seeking to set aside an arbitral a...
- 76
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Execution Matter — Post-Award Interest Calculation Must Follow Hyder Consulting Principle. Court holds that post-award interest under Section 31(7)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is payable on the entire sum awarded including pre-award interest, overruling S.L. Arora.
13 Dec 2024The dispute arose from a contract awarded by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (appellant) to M/s. S.A. Builders Ltd. (respondent) in 1983 for con...
- 670
High Court
Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4 Feb 2013The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...
- 133
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.
1 Aug 2026The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...
- 113
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.
1 Aug 2026Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...
- 65
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction Under Section 16 and Order Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11; Alternative Remedies U/S 34 and Article 136 Must Be Availed. The court found that an order under Section 11 is challengeable only before the Supreme Court under Article 136, and a Section 16 order can be contested after the award under Section 34, thus barring writ jurisdiction.
17 Oct 2023This writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government enterprise, and a joint ventu...
- 45
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.
16 Dec 2019The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...
- 243
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.
20 Feb 2014The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...
- 127
