Search Results for "Judicial conscience"

1062 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1062 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petitions in Land Dispute Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review petitions under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC dismissed as petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or discovery of new evidence.

The judgment pertains to two review petitions filed by Sri. Prakash Gangaram (represented by GPA holder Sri. Subbaramaiah) against the Deputy Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions in University Dispute Over Natural Justice. Management Council Must Hear Affected Party Before Acting on Grievance Committee Report Under Maharashtra University of Health Sciences Act.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Medical Education and Research Foundation and Jamanlal Goenka Dental College and Hospital, filed two writ petitions challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Labour Court Order Setting Aside Termination with Retrospective Effect. Termination of Employee with Retrospective Effect from Date of Medical Unfitness Held Illegal as It Deprives Employee of Opportunity to Be Heard.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment of the Labour Court dated 22.08.2017 allowing Complaint ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Chief Manager Challenging Disciplinary Action for Accepting Forged Bank Guarantee. Reduction in Pay Scale Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Misconduct of Violating CMC Manual Guidelines.

The petitioner, Rajendraprasad Shukla, was working as Chief Manager (Finance) at Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), a subsidiary of Coal India Limited....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Aakash Educational Services Limited Challenging Arbitral Award — Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Contract Interpretation Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aakash Educational Services Limited, filed two writ petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challengi...