High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Decides Multiple Letters Patent Appeals. The Decision Involves First Appeals and Related Disputes.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "First Class"
32552 result(s) found
Found 32552 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reserves Judgment in Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Disappearance of Evidence. Accused Challenges Reliability of Circumstantial Evidence Including Test Identification Parade and Recovery Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
9 Jul 2026The appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 08.12.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 179/2014, convicting ...
- 71
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal Against High Court Acquittal of Nine Accused in Dr. Subbiah Murder Case — Conviction and Death Sentences Set Aside by High Court on Conspiracy and Common Intention Charges. High Court Acquitted All Accused Rejecting Prosecution's Evidence on Conspiracy and Murder Under Sections 120-B, 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
1 Jan 1970The present criminal appeals arose from the murder of Dr. Subbiah, a reputed doctor at Billroth Hospital, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai. On 14.09.2013,...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Compensation for Alleged Illegal Detention and Torture by Karnataka Police. Petitioner Alleges Violation of D.K. Basu Guidelines and Extortion via ATM Withdrawals During Unaccounted Custody.
17 Oct 2019The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by the wife of an alleged detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking compensation ...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.
19 Nov 2010The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...
- 18
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.
3 Nov 2025This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...
- 39
High Court
WRIT PETITION NO.730 OF 2009
14 Jul 2011The four writ petitions arose from income tax assessment proceedings concerning the transfer of shares of Idea Cellular Limited (formerly Birla Commun...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Contractors and service providers seek independent arbitrator for claims against Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike under Clause 10 of Agreement dated 15-03-2007.
17 Mar 2015Multiple civil miscellaneous petitions were filed by contractors and service providers before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru under Section 1...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Multiple Petitions for Arbitrator Appointment in BBMP Contract Disputes. Petitioners Seek Independent Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Claims Under Clause 10 of Agreement Dated 15.03.2007.
17 Mar 2015The matter involves multiple Civil Miscellaneous Petitions (CMP) filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitrati...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Removal of Employees Appointed on Compassionate Grounds Without Following Regular Recruitment Process. The Petitioners, Appointed as Hamals and Clerk-Typists Under a State Government Scheme for Dependents of Retiring Class IV Employees, Argued That Their Long Service of 18 Years Entitled Them to Absorption, While Respondents Contended That the Appointments Were Back-Door Entries in Violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
21 Apr 2017The judgment pertains to five writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 16th November 2015 by the...
- 79
