Search Results for "time barred"

5474 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5474 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Tenant for Subletting and Unauthorised Assignment. Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 106 Notice Upheld as Valid.

The case involves a dispute over eviction of a tenant from premises in Mumbai. The original landlord, Mr. N.V. Baliga, owned a building at 257, Frere ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Binding. Court holds that first appellate court's reversal of trial court's decree was based on evidence and not perverse under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petitions Challenging Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Property Dispute. Court holds that appointment of arbitrator by consent of parties is valid and cannot be challenged under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration petitions filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners in Arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Restores Trial Court's Decree of Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Berth Reservation Agreement — Restores Arbitral Award. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Limitation and Merits Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s.X-Press Container Lines (UK) Ltd., entered into a Berth Reservation Agreement with the respondent, the Board of Trustees of the Por...