Search Results for "tax entry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "tax entry"

1517 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1517 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows IGST Refund to Exporter Despite Initial Error in GST Return. Inadvertent Mistake in Invoice Number and Port Code in GSTR-1 Does Not Bar Refund of IGST on Zero-Rated Supply Under Section 16(3) of IGST Act, 2017.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Sunlight Cable Industries, exported insulated cables to M/s. Khin Maung Tum & Brothers Co. Ltd., Myanmar, and paid Integrated Goods an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Cess Demand Against Small Scale Unit in MIDC Area for Lack of Jurisdiction. NMMC Cannot Levy Cess on Industrial Premises Outside Its Municipal Limits Under Section 127 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

8 Jul 2010

The petitioners, M/s Sargam Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged the order dated 29th November 2007 passed by the Cess Officer of the Navi Mum...

High Court

Special Court at Bombay Allows Recovery Suit Against Notified Person Under Special Court Act, 1992 — Custodian's Claim for Notified Property Rejected Due to Lack of Evidence of Tainted Transaction. The court held that the suit for recovery of Rs. 6 Crores is maintainable and the Custodian failed to prove that the property is notified property under Section 3 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.

31 Jan 2019

The plaintiffs, Smt. Jyoti H. Mehta, Shri Ashwin S. Mehta, and M/s. ZEST Holdings Pvt. Ltd., filed Special Court Suit No. 1 of 2017 before the Special...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses RTI Petition Seeking GST Returns of Third Parties — Information Denied as Personal and Confidential Under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act, 2005. The court held that GST returns filed by firms are personal information relating to commercial confidence and trade secrets, and disclosure requires consent or proof of larger public interest.

14 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Adarsh S/o Gautam Pimpare, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging orders passed by the Jan Mahit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Writ Petitions Filed Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners Sought Declaration That 1977-78 BDA Land Acquisition Had Lapsed Due to Non-Taking of Possession or Non-Payment of Compensation.

14 Dec 2017

These three sets of writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka, all relating to the acquisition of land measuring seven acres in Sur...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

27 Apr 2018

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Lapse of Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; HSR Layout Scheme Fully Implemented, Acquisition Completed. Appellant's Claim for Lapse Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Rejected as Possession Taken and Third-Party Rights Created.

1 Dec 2020

The litigation arose from the acquisition of 20 guntas of land in Sy. No. 146 of Agara Village for the formation of HSR Layout by the Bengaluru Develo...

High Court

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018

18 Jun 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Policy Circulars in SEIS Benefits Case — Circulars Imposing Additional Conditions for Service Providers Held Ultra Vires. Shipping Agent Entitled to SEIS Benefits as Service Provider Under Foreign Trade Policy.

9 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Atlantic Shipping Private Limited, a shipping agent providing port services and logistical support to foreign clients, challenged the ...

65 66 67 68 69

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)