High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "limited review"
3995 result(s) found
Found 3995 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Strikes Down BCCL's Tender Decision for Arbitrariness and Discrimination. The Supreme Court upholds fairness and transparency in government contracts, ensuring compliance with constitutional principles.
4 Oct 2024The court held that government authorities, while exercising discretion in contractual matters, must ensure fairness, transparency, and equality. The ...
- 978
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reviews Challenge to CCI Investigation Order in Online Marketplaces Case — Petitioners Contend Lack of Prima Facie Opinion and Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition Under Section 26(1) of Competition Act, 2002.
11 Jun 2021The dispute involves writ petitions filed by Amazon Seller Services Private Limited and Flipkart Internet Private Limited, challenging an order dated ...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Renew Wind Energy (Rajkot) Pvt Ltd. Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) Scheme does not override State Commission's power to determine tariff for wind energy under Section 62 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
13 Apr 2023The case involves appeals under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, by Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and other distribution licensees against...
- 159
Tribunals
NCLAT Hears Appeal Against NCLT Order in Byju's Insolvency Case — NCLT Set Aside CoC Reconstitution and Reclassification of Creditor. Appeal Filed by Suspended Director and Promoter Under Section 61 of IBC Challenges Validity of NCLT Directions.
30 Nov -0001The appeal was filed by Byju Raveendran, the suspended director and promoter of M/s Think and Learn Pvt. Ltd., under Section 61 of the Insolvency and ...
- 134
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Tender Process in Government Procurement Under National AYUSH Mission. The court held that paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the Operational Guidelines requires a transparent tendering process among eligible establishments, including IMPCL, Public Sector Undertakings, state government pharmacies, and cooperatives, to ensure competition and quality in the procurement of Ayurvedic medicines.
3 Jan 2023The dispute arose from a petition filed by Kerala Ayurvedic Co-operative Society Limited before the Lucknow Bench of the High Court of Judicature at A...
- 411
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.
24 Apr 2020The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...
- 373
High Court
High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.
24 Feb 2026The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Restoration of Writ Petition in SEBI Matter — No Case Made Out for Review or Recall of Final Order. Court holds that an interim application seeking restoration of a disposed writ petition is not maintainable when the main petition was disposed of by consent and no grounds for review or recall exist under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC or inherent powers.
22 Dec 2023The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application filed by the original petitioners (minority shareholders of Bharat Nidhi Ltd. - BNL) seeking re...
- 42
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 224
