Search Results for "cancellation notice"

2629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Succession Certificate Granted to Widow and Children in Summary Proceeding Under Indian Succession Act. Concurrent findings of fact on validity of marriage cannot be interfered with under Section 115 CPC in absence of jurisdictional error or perversity.

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 384(1)(3) of the Indian Succession Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MIDC to Resume Possession of Plots from Company in Liquidation for Non-Payment of Rent. Lease Termination Upheld Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 — Permission Granted Under Section 446 for Resumption of Possession.

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed an application seeking permission to resume legal and physical possession of Plots No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Bank Challenging Appointment of Administrator Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Court holds that the Registrar's satisfaction regarding supersession of board is subjective and not open to judicial review unless mala fides or perversity is shown.

The petitioner, Janakalyan Sahakari Bank Limited, a cooperative bank, filed a writ petition challenging the appointment of an administrator by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.

The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...