Search Results for "Valid notice"

8881 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8881 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suits as Patents Were Revoked Prior to Filing. Summary Judgment Granted Under Order XIII-A CPC as Plaintiff Had No Locus Standi to Sue for Infringement of Revoked Patents.

The plaintiff, Bharat Bhogilal Patel, filed two suits for infringement of two patents granted in 2003. The defendants, TVS Electronics Ltd. and Kalelk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Action to Remove Unauthorized Vertical Extension in Notified Slum. Unauthorized Construction Cannot Be Protected Merely Because It Is Situated in a Slum Area.

The appellant, Mujibur Rehman Chaudhary, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay challenging a notice dated 31 December 2019 issued by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Grampanchayat Dispute. Special Meeting Convened by Tahsildar Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 Held Valid Despite Alleged Procedural Irregularities.

The petitioner, Surekha Eshwar Jadhav, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Bhatapur (PD), Taluka Mukhed, District Nanded. Respondent nos.1 to 6, who wer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Section 35(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Notice Issued by Tahsildar Without Proper Verification of Signatures and Without Giving Opportunity to Sarpanch to Explain Grounds.

The petitioner, Shri Raviraj Sambhajirao Nimbalkar, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kalnakwadi, Kolhapur. On 21st November 2017, some members...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Validity of Special General Meeting Notice for No-Confidence Motion Against Town Panchayat President Under Karnataka Municipalities Act. The court considered precedents to determine if the 10-day notice requirement under Section 42(9) proviso is mandatory or directory.

The petitioner, Smt Damayanthi, was the elected President of Vitla Town Panchayat, having assumed charge on 16.01.2019 after an election. The Town Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...