Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1044 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1044 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Examines Validity of Ahmedpur Development Plan Notification Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Core Issue Involves Mandatory or Directory Nature of Section 26(1) Timeline and Permissible Limits of Extension Under Third Proviso.

The case involved three writ petitions filed by landowners in Ahmedpur, District Latur, challenging a notification dated 29.03.2012 published on 08.05...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Premium Paid for FSI Exclusion in Town Planning Case — No Development Commenced, No Benefit Availed. The court held that retention of premium without providing any benefit amounts to unjust enrichment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioners, Shri Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Smt. Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 15 February 2020...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...