Search Results for "Article 173"

1054 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1054 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Unexplained Delay of Over 30 Days in Deciding Representation Violates Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ajay Suresh Alande, brother of the detenu Chetan Suresh Alande, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellants Fail to Prove Exclusive Title Over Suit Property. Court upholds trial court's finding that suit property was joint family property and not self-acquired, dismissing appeal for lack of evidence.

The appellants, five sisters, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of a property situated at Village Manor, Taluka Palghar, District Tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation to Accused for Malicious Prosecution Due to Gross Investigation Lapses. Lapses Included Filing Charge-Sheet Despite Evidence That Alleged Murder Victim Was Alive, Violating Right to Life Under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The case arose from a murder investigation where the petitioner was arrested and prosecuted for the murder of a man named Guddu, whose crushed body wa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Charge-Sheet Issued Under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules Two Days Before Retirement. Department's 13-year delay in initiating proceedings and subsequent acquittal in criminal case on same facts raised questions of law.

The petitioner, a member of the Indian Revenue Service (Customs and Central Excise) recruited in 1979, was working as Additional Commissioner of Custo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 350 OF 2017

The case concerns two petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14 February ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 27 Days in Deciding Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution of India, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Vijay Subhash Kore, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Reclassification from OBC Handicapped to Open Physically Handicapped Category After Termination Due to Invalid Caste Certificate. Petitioner cannot change category after appointment and termination; no vested right to be considered in a different category.

The petitioner, Savankumar Jagdishchandra Mandwal, was appointed in the Other Backward Classes (OBC) handicapped category by the Zilla Parishad, Hingo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Bail Orders.

The petitioner, Shailesh Dnyaneshwar Kedar, challenged a detention order dated 23 November 2014 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under Se...