Search Results for "substantially same issues"

1763 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1763 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Aurangabad Bench Hears First Appeals Against Common Decree in Two Special Civil Suits; Dispute Involves Recovery for Liquor Supplies and Refund of Security Deposit, Raising Issues of Adjustment, Burden of Proof, and Competency to Sue

These three first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 arise from a common judgment dated 11-10-1999 by the 4th Joint Civil J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.

The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Allowing Counter-Claim in Property Suit. Amendment of Plaint After Issues Settled Constitutes Exceptional Circumstance Justifying Filing of Counter-Claim Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.

The petitioner, Vijaymala Sidling Doijad, filed a suit (Regular Civil Suit No.1056 of 2006) seeking injunction against the State of Maharashtra and th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Grounds for Interference Established. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse, and the Petition Was Barred by Limitation.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to set aside an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — No Patent Illegality Found. Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Held Plausible and Not Open to Interference.

The petitioner, Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, before the B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Murder by Burning Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Mental Instability and Provocation.

The case arises from an incident on 14th April 2017, when the accused, Deepak Birbahadur Jath, poured petrol on Amravati (deceased) and set her on fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee Under POSH Act in Cross-Departmental Complaint. Court Considers Whether ICC at Aggrieved Woman's Workplace Can Proceed Against Respondent Employed Elsewhere, Focusing on Statutory Definitions and Vishaka Guidelines.

The appeal arises out of a jurisdictional challenge by Dr. Sohail Malik, a 2010 batch Indian Revenue Service officer posted as OSD, Investigation, Cen...