Search Results for "section 202 inquiry"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen Together, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Mangesh Rajaram Sawant, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay for the murder of his wife Noori @ Manisha on 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Wife's Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 and 201 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and consistent with guilt.

The appellant, Dashrath Dada Salunkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malashiras for the murder of his wife Vimal @ Anita and for cau...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Process in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Failure to Pay Under Consent Terms Does Not Attract Criminal Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 When Dispute is Essentially Civil.

The petitioners, Nirman Raltors and Developers Ltd. and two individuals, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06.09.2018 passed by the Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Pardon Order in Sessions Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 307 CrPC — Pardon Granted Without Recording Reasons or Considering Accused's Objections.

The petitioner, Nagnath s/o Rajaram Ghuge, was the accused in Sessions Case No. 41/2010 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their ...