Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Mannewar' Tribe — Failure to Consider Pre-Constitutional Documents and Affidavits of Relatives Constitutes Violation of Natural Justice. The Court remitted the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Committee to decide the caste claim within three months after hearing the petitioner.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Prathamesh S/o Vikram Banne, challenged the order dated 16.02.2024 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, which invalidated his caste claim as 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe (Sr. No. 18 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950) and confiscated/cancelled the caste certificate issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Akola on 16.07.2019. The petitioner had cleared his 12th class examination from Khandelwal Gyan Mandir Junior College of Science and Commerce, Akola, and his caste claim was forwarded by the Principal to the Committee on 10.12.2019. In support of his claim, the petitioner submitted pre-constitutional documents including a Transfer Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna Aatmaram dated 16.10.1942 showing caste as 'Mannewar', a Birth Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna dated 30.10.1936 showing caste as 'Mannewar', a Dakhal Kharij Extract of Madhukar Laxman Banne dated 07.06.1939 showing caste as 'Telgu Mannewar', and a Birth extract of Bhudevi Shivanna dated 05.06.1936 showing caste as 'Mannewar'. Since the Committee did not decide the claim within a reasonable period, the petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2501/2020, which was disposed of with a direction to the Committee to decide the claim within a stipulated time. The Committee then passed the impugned order invalidating the claim. The High Court noted that the Committee failed to consider the pre-constitutional documents and the affidavits of relatives, which were crucial evidence. The Court held that the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice and was unsustainable. The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration, directing the petitioner to appear before the Committee on 11.11.2024. The Committee was directed to decide the claim afresh within three months from the date of appearance, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Headnote

A) Scheduled Tribes - Caste Certificate Scrutiny - Validity of Order - The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste claim as 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe without considering pre-constitutional documents and affidavits of relatives - The High Court held that the Committee's order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice as it failed to appreciate material evidence - The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted back for fresh consideration (Paras 1-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste claim as 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe is sustainable when the Committee failed to consider pre-constitutional documents and affidavits of relatives.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 16.02.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 1 Committee is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Committee for fresh consideration. The petitioner is directed to appear before the Committee on 11.11.2024. The Committee shall decide the caste claim of the petitioner afresh within three months from the date of appearance, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

Law Points

  • Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents including pre-constitutional records and affidavits of relatives
  • Failure to consider material evidence amounts to violation of principles of natural justice
  • Order invalidating caste claim without proper appreciation of evidence is unsustainable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-NAG:10453-DB

Writ Petition No. 2896 of 2024

2025-10-08

MRS. M. S. JAWALKAR, RAJ D. WAKODE

2025:BHC-NAG:10453-DB

Mr. Ashwin Deshpande for petitioner, Mr. A. M. Kadukar, AGP for respondents

Prathamesh S/o Vikram Banne

The Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Division, Amravati; Sub-Divisional Officer, Akola

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition challenging the order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee invalidating the petitioner's caste claim as 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the impugned order dated 16.02.2024 and restoration of the caste certificate.

Filing Reason

The Scrutiny Committee invalidated the petitioner's caste claim without considering pre-constitutional documents and affidavits of relatives.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition No. 2501/2020 which was disposed of with a direction to the Committee to decide the claim within a stipulated time.

Issues

Whether the Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the caste claim is sustainable when it failed to consider pre-constitutional documents and affidavits of relatives. Whether the order was passed in violation of principles of natural justice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that he had submitted pre-constitutional documents including Transfer Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna Aatmaram (16.10.1942), Birth Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna (30.10.1936), Dakhal Kharij Extract of Madhukar Laxman Banne (07.06.1939), and Birth extract of Bhudevi Shivanna (05.06.1936) all showing caste as 'Mannewar'. Petitioner also submitted affidavits of relatives in support of his claim. The Committee failed to consider these documents and passed the impugned order.

Ratio Decidendi

The Scrutiny Committee must consider all relevant documents including pre-constitutional records and affidavits of relatives before deciding a caste claim. Failure to consider such material evidence amounts to violation of principles of natural justice, rendering the order unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner by this Petition is challenging the order dated 16.02.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 1 Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati thereby invalidating the caste claim of the Petitioner to the 'Mannewar' Scheduled Tribe mentioned at Sr. No. 18 of the Constitution (Schedule Tribe) Order, 1950. In support of his caste claim, the Petitioner submitted following documents of Pre-constitutional period: Transfer Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna Aatmaram (16.10.1942), Birth Certificate of Ratanbabu Bijanna (30.10.1936), Dakhal Kharij Extract of Madhukar Laxman Banne (07.06.1939), Birth extract of Bhudevi Shivanna (05.06.1936). The impugned order is quashed and set aside. The matter is remitted back to the Respondent No. 1 Committee for fresh consideration.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 2501/2020 earlier which was disposed of with a direction to the Committee to decide the claim within a stipulated time. The Committee then passed the impugned order on 16.02.2024 invalidating the caste claim. The petitioner filed the present Writ Petition No. 2896 of 2024 challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution (Scheduled Tribe) Order, 1950: Sr. No. 18
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Certificate for 'Mannewar' Tribe — Failure to Consider Pre-Constitutional Documents and Affidavits of Relatives Constitutes Violation of Natural Justice. The Court remi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Directs Registration of FIR and Compensation for Assault on Prisoner in Custody. State Liable for Custodial Violence Under Prisoner Rights.