Search Results for "additional benefits"

3752 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3752 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Possession Suit — Licensee's Claim of Ownership Rejected. Staff Quarter Adjoining Purchased Flat Held to Be Part of Suit Premises; Licensee Cannot Claim Ownership After License Revocation.

The case involves a first appeal against a decree of eviction passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai. The respondent/original plaintiff, Anjana Viren ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Cross Petitions in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Illegal Termination but Awards Compensation Instead of Reinstatement. Labour Court's finding of illegal retrenchment upheld, but compensation of Rs. 3 lakh substituted for reinstatement and backwages.

The judgment concerns two cross petitions arising from an industrial dispute between M/s. Yashmun Engineers Ltd (employer) and Sudhir Jagannath Kulkar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Bank Employee Seeking Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement. Employee's Application for Withdrawal After Acceptance of Resignation Not Maintainable as Per Service Regulations.

The petitioner, Sadiq Shafi Qureshi, was serving as an Assistant Manager with the erstwhile Corporation Bank (now merged with Union Bank of India). He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Assistant Teacher's Claim for Sixth Pay Commission Benefits in Unaided School Without Amendment to Schedule C of MEPS Rules, 1981. Principle of res judicata and judgment in rem not applicable to extend benefit to non-parties.

The petitioner, Smt. Shobha w/o Subash Dhote, an Assistant Teacher at respondent No.5 (Golden Kids Marathip High School, an unaided school), filed a w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...