Search Results for "Cooperative Bank"

1500 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1500 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Co-opted Director in Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner, a medical practitioner co-opted as director of a cooperative bank, was not named in charge-sheets and no material showed her involvement in alleged misappropriation.

The petitioner, a medical practitioner, was co-opted as a director of Samta Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative society running banking business, from 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case. Appeal Raises Questions on Identification of Accused and Seizure of Cash Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Arms Act, 1959.

This criminal appeal arose from Sessions Case No. 26/2003 where the appellant (original accused No. 4) was convicted for dacoity under sections 395, 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment Project Despite Narrow Road Width, Applies Promissory Estoppel Against Municipal Corporation. MCGM Estopped from Refusing Permission After Granting Initial Approval and Petitioner Acting to His Detriment.

The petitioner, Gufran Suleman Qureshi, proprietor of M/s Sirsiwala Realty, sought redevelopment of a building in Mumbai. The Municipal Corporation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order of Debts Recovery Tribunal in Cooperative Bank Case. The Court held that an ex-parte order passed without hearing the petitioner is liable to be set aside in the interest of justice.

The petitioner, The Khamgaon Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd, challenged an ex-parte order dated 26.08.2009 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in GCA TV Subsidy Misappropriation Case Due to Lack of New Material and Abuse of Process. Second FIR for part of same amount already covered in first FIR is not maintainable under Section 482 CrPC and Article 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Dayanand G. Narvekar, was the President of the Goa Cricket Association (GCA) during 2006-2007. The Board of Control for Cricket in Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal for Interest and Damages in Contribution Recovery Case. Employer's Liability for Delayed Payment of ESI Contributions Attracts Statutory Interest and Damages Under Sections 39(5)(a) and 85-B of ESI Act, 1948.

The appellant, Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challengin...