Search Results for "second petition maintainability"

1749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Income Exceeding Limit Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claim Petition Under Section 163-A Held Not Maintainable as Deceased's Annual Income Exceeded Rs.40,000/- Prescribed Limit.

The appellant, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 10/03/2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Revision Petition in Maintenance Case Under Section 125 CrPC — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Neglect and Refusal to Maintain. Wife's Entitlement to Maintenance Affirmed Despite Husband's Claim of Second Marriage and Alleged Adultery.

The petitioner, Smt. Shakuntala, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Second Appeal in Land Dispute Case Due to Non-Compliance with Conditional Order. Court holds that failure to pay costs as directed by the court results in dismissal of the appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The State of Karnataka and its officers filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...