High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "relevant materials"
5046 result(s) found
Found 5046 result(s)
High Court
High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order Under Income Tax Act -- Reassessment Proceedings for AY 2012-13 Declared Time-Barred and Invalid
20 Jan 2026The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the consequent Assessment Ord...
- 310
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Bail Granted to Accused in NIA Terror Case — No Prima Facie Case for Detention Under UAP Act. Court upholds High Court's finding that the accused's name did not appear in FIR or witness statements, and bail conditions were not violated.
10 May 2024The Union of India appealed against the High Court of Jharkhand's order granting bail to the respondent in a case investigated by the National Investi...
- 421
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Case Due to Omnibus Allegations and Lack of Specificity. FIR Lodged as Counterblast to Divorce Petition, Charge-Sheet Under Section 376 Dropped, and No Protest Filed.
19 Feb 2025The present appeal arose from an order dated 31.08.2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, which dismissed an application under Sect...
- 1105
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court's Alteration of Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Land Dispute Case. Prosecution's Suppression of Accused's FIR and Injury Reports Creates Reasonable Doubt.
6 Aug 2019The Supreme Court dismissed two appeals filed by the complainant and the State of Karnataka against the High Court's judgment altering the conviction ...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Customs Licence for Export Oriented Unit Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering reply, set aside with restoration of licence.
22 Jul 2022The petitioner, Sarla Performance Fibers Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of synthetic yarn...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Vagueness and Violation of Natural Justice — Show Cause Notice Lacked Full Particulars of Incidents, Rendering Externment Unsustainable Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.
21 Oct 2020The petitioner, Dinesh Santlal Yadav, challenged an externment order dated 22/11/2019 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-3, Kalyan, und...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit for Recovery Due to Prior Arbitration Awards. The court held that the suit is barred by res judicata as the same claims were already adjudicated in arbitration proceedings under the Arbitration Act, 1940.
26 Sep 2012The plaintiff, Unique Integrated Transport & Management Consultancies Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) and its of...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Advance Ruling on Job Work Classification Under GST — Conversion of Coal into Electricity and Electricity into Steel Held Not Job Work. The arrangement between two related entities for conversion of inputs into electricity and steel on job work basis does not qualify as 'job work' under Section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017 as the process does not result in the same goods being returned.
7 Jun 2019The petitioner, JSW Energy Limited (JEL), engaged in generation and sale of electricity, proposed an arrangement with JSW Steel Limited (JSL) involvin...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Anonymous Complaint and Stale Incidents Insufficient to Sustain Preventive Detention. The court held that reliance on an unverified anonymous complaint and two criminal cases where the detenu was on bail did not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.
25 Feb 2005The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged a detention order dated 25-2-2004 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous A...
- 128
