Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Customs Licence for Export Oriented Unit Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering reply, set aside with restoration of licence.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sarla Performance Fibers Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of synthetic yarn as a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) at its two units in Silvassa. It held a licence under Section 58(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, allowing duty-free import of capital goods and raw materials. On 10th January 2005, Respondent No.2, the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, passed an order cancelling the licence under Section 58(2)(b) of the Act and directing the petitioner to pay appropriate customs and central excise duties on capital goods, raw materials, and finished goods lying in stock. The petitioner challenged this order by way of a writ petition. The court issued rule on 4th February 2005 and granted interim relief subject to conditions, which was modified on 5th May 2005. Pursuant to interim orders, the petitioner made certain deposits. The court found that the show cause notice issued to the petitioner did not specify the grounds for cancellation, and the impugned order did not consider the petitioner's reply. The court held that the cancellation was in violation of principles of natural justice and suffered from non-application of mind. The court quashed the impugned order, restored the licence, and directed that the petitioner be allowed to continue as an EOU subject to compliance with conditions. The court also directed that the deposits made by the petitioner be adjusted or refunded as per law.

Headnote

A) Customs Law - Licence Cancellation - Section 58(1) and 58(2)(b) Customs Act, 1962 - Natural Justice - Show Cause Notice - The petitioner, a 100% EOU, challenged cancellation of its licence under Section 58(2)(b) on grounds of non-application of mind and violation of natural justice. The court held that the show cause notice did not specify the grounds for cancellation and the impugned order did not consider the petitioner's reply, rendering the cancellation invalid. (Paras 1-10)

B) Customs Law - Export Oriented Unit - Duty Free Imports - Section 58 Customs Act, 1962 - The petitioner was a 100% EOU and had imported capital goods and raw materials duty free. The cancellation of licence led to demand for duties. The court set aside the cancellation and restored the licence, directing that the petitioner be allowed to continue as EOU subject to compliance with conditions. (Paras 2-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of licence under Section 58(2)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 was valid when the show cause notice did not specify the grounds and the order did not consider the petitioner's reply.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The impugned order dated 10th January 2005 is quashed and set aside. The licence under Section 58(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 is restored. The petitioner is allowed to continue as a 100% EOU subject to compliance with conditions. The deposits made by the petitioner pursuant to interim orders shall be adjusted or refunded as per law.

Law Points

  • Natural justice
  • Show cause notice
  • Non-application of mind
  • Section 58 Customs Act 1962
  • Export Oriented Unit
  • Licence cancellation
  • Speaking order
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (07) 85

Writ Petition No. 60 of 2005

2022-07-22

K. R. Shriram, A. S. Doctor

2022:BHC-AS:33207-DB

Mr. Prakash Shah i/b M/s. DSK Legal for Petitioner, Mr. Vijay H. Kantharia a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for Respondents

Sarla Performance Fibers Limited

Union of India, Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Division – II, Silvassa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging cancellation of licence under Section 58(2)(b) of Customs Act, 1962.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of order dated 10th January 2005 cancelling its licence and demanding duties, and restoration of licence.

Filing Reason

The petitioner's licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act was cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering its reply, violating natural justice.

Previous Decisions

Rule was issued on 4th February 2005 and interim relief was granted subject to conditions, modified on 5th May 2005. Petitioner made deposits pursuant to interim orders.

Issues

Whether the cancellation of licence under Section 58(2)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 was valid when the show cause notice did not specify the grounds and the order did not consider the petitioner's reply.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the show cause notice did not specify the grounds for cancellation and the impugned order did not consider its reply, violating principles of natural justice. Respondents argued in support of the cancellation order.

Ratio Decidendi

Cancellation of a licence under Section 58(2)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 must be preceded by a proper show cause notice specifying the grounds, and the order must consider the licensee's reply. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the order invalid.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioner is impugning an order dated 10th January 2005 passed by Respondent No.2 by which Respondent No.2 has cancelled the licence under Sub Section 2(b) of Section 58 granted to petitioner under Sub Section (1) of Section 58 of the Customs Act, 1962. Rule was issued on 4th February 2005 and interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) subject to certain conditions imposed therein, modified by an order dated 5th May 2005, was granted.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 4th February 2005 challenging the order dated 10th January 2005. Rule was issued on the same day with interim relief. The interim relief was modified on 5th May 2005. The petition was finally heard and decided on 22nd July 2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Customs Act, 1962: Section 58, Section 58(1), Section 58(2)(b)
  • Customs and Central Excise Act, 1944:
  • Companies Act, 1956:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Customs Licence for Export Oriented Unit Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Licence under Section 58(1) of Customs Act, 1962 cancelled without proper show cause notice and without considering reply, set asi...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Non-Disclosure of Offence Under MRTU & PULP Act — Transfer Order Violation Not Sufficient to Attract Section 48 Without Specific Averments of Unfair Labour Practice. The court held that a complaint u...