Search Results for "political activities"

669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Forgery and Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioners Accused of Forgery and Cheating Under Sections 468, 471, 420 IPC - FIR Quashed as Allegations Did Not Disclose Any Offence.

The petitioners, Dr. S. Malini and Dr. B.K. Muralidhar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.27/2010 r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 NI Act is committed at the place of dishonour and service of notice, which was Delhi, not Bangalore.

The petitioners, Sri Devidas Garg, Smt. Amita Garg, and Sri Santhosh Kumar Garg, filed two criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Validity of Proviso to Section 115JB(6) of Income Tax Act in SEZ Cases. The court held that the proviso inserted by Finance Act, 2011 is not ultra vires the SEZ Act and is valid and enforceable.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by companies operating in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) challenging the constitutional validity of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...