High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Forgery and Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioners Accused of Forgery and Cheating Under Sections 468, 471, 420 IPC - FIR Quashed as Allegations Did Not Disclose Any Offence.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Dr. S. Malini and Dr. B.K. Muralidhar, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.27/2010 registered by Halasurugate Police, Bengaluru, for offences under Sections 468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420 of IPC. The FIR was based on a reference order passed by the VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. The petitioners argued that the allegations in the FIR did not disclose any prima facie case against them and that the proceedings were an abuse of process of law. The court heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioners, the High Court Government Pleader for the State, and the counsel for the second respondent. After perusing the records, the court found that the essential ingredients of the alleged offences were not made out. The court noted that there was no material to show that the petitioners forged any document or cheated the complainant. Consequently, the court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR, holding that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Section 482 CrPC - Inherent Powers - The court examined whether the FIR disclosed a prima facie case against the petitioners for the alleged offences. Held that the allegations in the FIR and the material on record did not make out the essential ingredients of the offences under Sections 468, 471, and 420 IPC, and continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law. (Paras 1-10)

B) Indian Penal Code - Forgery and Cheating - Sections 468, 471, 420 IPC - Prima Facie Case - The court analyzed the allegations of forgery of documents and cheating. Held that there was no evidence to show that the petitioners forged any document or cheated the complainant, and the FIR was liable to be quashed. (Paras 3-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR registered against the petitioners for offences under Sections 468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420 of IPC should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC for lack of prima facie evidence and abuse of process of law.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The FIR in Crime No.27/2010 (PCR No.1729/2010) registered by Halasurugate Police, Bengaluru, for offences under Sections 468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420 of IPC is quashed.

Law Points

  • Quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC
  • Lack of prima facie case
  • Abuse of process of law
  • Ingredients of Sections 468
  • 471
  • 420 IPC not made out
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (07) 36

Criminal Petition No. 9183/2016

2018-07-05

K.N. Phaneendra

M. T. Nanaiah, Sr. Counsel for Smt. Rachita Nanaiah M., Adv. for petitioners; Chetan Desai, HCGP for R1; L. Prakash, Adv. for R2

Dr. S. Malini and Dr. B.K. Muralidhar

The State of Karnataka and Pradeep Kumar G. S.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR in Crime No.27/2010 (PCR No.1729/2010) registered by Halasurugate Police, Bengaluru

Filing Reason

Allegations of offences under Sections 468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420 IPC

Previous Decisions

Reference order passed by VI Addl. CMM, Bengaluru

Issues

Whether the FIR discloses a prima facie case against the petitioners for the alleged offences? Whether the proceedings are an abuse of process of law warranting quashing under Section 482 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the FIR does not disclose any prima facie case and the allegations are vague and baseless. Respondents argued that the FIR discloses cognizable offences and investigation should proceed.

Ratio Decidendi

The FIR and the material on record do not make out the essential ingredients of the alleged offences under Sections 468, 471, and 420 IPC. Continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of process of law, hence the FIR is liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the first respondent – State and as well the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent herein. The petitioners have sought for quashing of the registration of the FIR in Crime No.27/2010 (PCR No.1729/2010) on the basis of the Reference order passed by the VI Addl. CMM, Bengaluru, for the alleged offences punishable u/ss.468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420 of IPC.

Procedural History

The FIR was registered based on a reference order by the VI Addl. CMM, Bengaluru. The petitioners filed Criminal Petition No. 9183/2016 under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of the FIR. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 19.06.2018, and the order was pronounced on 05.07.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): 482
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): 468, 471, 168, 109, 202, 176, 177, 201, 120B, 420
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Police Patil Candidate Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointment Based on Legal Heir Preference. Preference Rule Valid as Tilting Factor Among Equally Qualified Candidates Under Government Gazette Not...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Gang Rape and Murder Case, Upholds Convictions and Life Sentences. Court finds no merit in appeals challenging conviction under Sections 376, 302, 201 read with 149 IPC for gang rape and murder of a minor ...