High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging Withdrawal of Labour Welfare Cess Exemption for SEZ Developers. The court held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 97
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, M/s. Primal Projects Limited, a company engaged in constructing and developing IT parks in Special Economic Zones (SEZ), challenged the order of the learned Single Judge who declined to interfere with the State Government's order dated 29.10.2009 withdrawing the exemption granted earlier in respect of 1% of Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost incurred by a developer/co-developer under the State Policy for Special Economic Zones – 2009. The appellant had been allotted land by the State Authority for development of industries and its project was approved by the State High Level Committee. The appellant availed the benefit of the exemption. The State Government, however, withdrew the exemption. The appellant filed a writ petition which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. The Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka, in this appeal, held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the Government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the order of the learned Single Judge.

Headnote

A) Labour Law - Labour Welfare Cess - Exemption - Withdrawal - The State Government granted exemption from 1% Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost for SEZ developers under the State Policy for Special Economic Zones – 2009. Subsequently, the Government withdrew the exemption by order dated 29.10.2009. The appellant challenged the withdrawal. Held that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the Government, and the appellant had no vested right to its continuation. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State Government could withdraw the exemption granted in respect of 1% Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost incurred by a developer/co-developer under the State Policy for Special Economic Zones – 2009.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the learned Single Judge is upheld.

Law Points

  • Labour Welfare Cess
  • Exemption
  • Withdrawal
  • Vested Right
  • Promissory Estoppel
  • Special Economic Zone Policy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 31

Writ Appeal No.8413/2012(T-Res)

2013-03-20

N.Kumar, B.Manohar

Sri.S.P.Shankar, Sr.Adv. for Smt.Mamata G. Kulkarni, Adv.

M/s. Primal Projects Limited

Union of India, State of Karnataka, Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against order of learned Single Judge declining to interfere with withdrawal of exemption from Labour Welfare Cess.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the order dated 10.10.2012 in Writ Petition No.22365/2010 and the order dated 29.10.2009 withdrawing exemption.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the withdrawal of exemption from 1% Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on 10.10.2012.

Issues

Whether the State Government could withdraw the exemption granted in respect of 1% Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost incurred by a developer/co-developer under the State Policy for Special Economic Zones – 2009.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the exemption was a vested right and could not be withdrawn. The respondents contended that the exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the Government.

Ratio Decidendi

The exemption was a concession and could be withdrawn by the Government; the appellant had no vested right to its continuation.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is filed challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge, who declined to interfere with the order of the State Government dated 29.10.2009 withdrawing the exemption granted earlier in respect of 1% of Labour Welfare Cess on construction cost incurred by a developer/Co-developer under 'State Policy for Special Economic Zones – 2009'.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition (No.22365/2010) challenging the withdrawal of exemption. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition on 10.10.2012. The appellant then filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landlord's Revision Petition in Rent Control Eviction Case — Bonafide Requirement Not Proven. Landlord failed to establish that the schedule property was reasonably and bonafidely required for his own use and occup...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Demolition of Illegal Construction on Gaothan Land in Cross Writ Petitions Between Trust and Corporation. Court holds that construction without valid building permission and in violation of development plan is illegal and lia...