Search Results for "executive notification"

2451 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2451 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Unauthorized Possession and Lapsed Proceedings. Possession taken in 2001 without acquisition; court directs compensation under 2013 Act with interest from date of possession.

The petitioners, four agriculturists from village Koradgaon Hilalpur, owned agricultural land admeasuring 1 hectare 73 ares (4 acres 13 ares) out of G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Nagar Panchayat Notification Under Section 341A of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act. State Government's Discretion to Determine Area of Nagar Panchayat Upheld; No Obligation to Include All Surrounding Gram Panchayats.

The petitioner, Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Amgaon, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a notification dated 12.2.2015 issued by the State o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications Under KIAD Act — Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable. Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Under KIAD Act, 1966 Held Not Governed by the 2013 Act, and Notifications Do Not Lapse.

The petitioners, landowners in Belagola village, Srirangapattana taluk, Mandya district, challenged the preliminary notification dated 15.09.2000 issu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Seniority Dispute Arising from Cadre Bifurcation and Re-amalgamation in Customs and Excise Department. Dispute Centers on Impact of Separate Data Processing Cadre on Ministerial Employee Seniority Under the 1979 Recruitment Rules.

The case involved a seniority dispute among employees of the Customs and Central Excise Department. The original ministerial cadre, governed by the Ce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...