Search Results for "distribution company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "distribution company"

1484 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1484 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Multi Year Tariff Regulations by Electricity Distribution Company — Procedural Compliance Upheld. Court holds that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission substantially complied with the requirement of previous publication under Section 181(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, and the Conduct of Business Regulations, 2004.

15 Nov 2011

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the Multi Year Tariff Regulations, 2011 framed by the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Sentence in Electricity Theft Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 235(2) CrPC — Remands for Hearing on Sentence. The trial court's failure to hear the accused on sentence before imposing punishment under Sections 135 and 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003, was held to be a serious irregularity warranting remand for fresh sentencing.

21 Mar 2012

The appellant, Dinkar S/o Dudhram Bante, was convicted by the trial court for offences punishable under Sections 135 and 138 of the Electricity Act, 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

13 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in International Taxation Case — Transfer Pricing Adjustments Not Required for Non-Resident Entities Without PE in India. Settlement Commission has exclusive jurisdiction to determine tax liability of non-resident entities, and transfer pricing provisions under Chapter X of Income Tax Act, 1961 do not apply to non-residents without permanent establishment in India.

28 Feb 2014

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai, challenging an order dated 31 January 2008 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in Tender Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Redevelopment Tender Process. Court Held That Appellant Failed to Show Any Legal Right to Be Considered as Developer and That Balance of Convenience Was Against Granting Injunction.

7 Apr 2016

The appellant, Ornate Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking to restrain Respondent No.1, the Abhyuday Nagar Sahakar...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Facilitation Council Award for Interest on Delayed Payments Under MSMED Act — Limitation Period for Reference Not Applicable. The court held that the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 is a complete code and the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to references made under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act.

15 Nov 2016

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited and others, successors of the erstwhile Maharashtra State Electricity Boar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Termination for Suppression of Criminal Antecedents in Employment Application. Suppressio veri or suggestio falsi in attestation form justified termination as per service conditions.

13 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Ravindra Ramesh Barkul, was appointed as a Junior Technician with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. He fille...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute Under FIDIC Contracts — Formula Interpretation Not Permissible When Language Is Clear. Court holds that a price escalation formula in a contract, being a mathematical expression, cannot be interpreted or varied by an arbitrator if its terms are unambiguous.

31 Mar 2017

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from contracts between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and two contractors, M/s. A...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Requirement of Knowledge Under Section 25 NDPS Act for Owner's Liability. Owner's Mere Ownership of Premises Insufficient to Establish Offence Without Evidence of Knowing Permission Under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

31 Aug 2024

The petitioner, a 68-year-old man, was the owner of a property that was rented out through a property manager for a birthday party. On 20.05.2024, pol...

63 64 65 66 67

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)