Search Results for "commercial execution petition"

1760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.

The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Unconditional Stay of Arbitral Award Due to Stamp Duty Deficiency. Arbitration Agreement in Unstamped Member Client Agreement Held Void Ab Initio Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, M/s. Anand Rathi Share & Stock Brokers Ltd., challenged an order passed by the District Judge-1, Amravati, which granted unconditional...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Petition Challenging Rejection of Tender Bids for NAINA Infrastructure Project; Interim Stay Ordered. CIDCO Tender Committee Rejected Petitioner's Joint Venture Bids Citing Integrity Pact, GST Registration, and Other Non-Compliances.

This writ petition was filed by Thakur Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd. (the lead member of a joint venture with EVRASCON) challenging the rejection of its tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Issues Rule and Hears Matter Finally in Writ Petition Challenging MSEDCL Communication. The Court Decides the Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution with Consent of Parties After Respondents Waive Service.

The petitioners, a private limited company and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Attachment and Sale of Residential Bungalow in Income Tax Recovery Proceedings. Order Beyond Limitation Period Under Rule 68B(3) of Second Schedule and Non-Compliance with Proclamation Requirements Render Sale Invalid.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the attachment and proposed sale of a residential bungalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Attachment and Proposed Sale of Residential Bungalow under Income Tax Act, 1961, on Ground of Limitation. Petitioner Contends That Tax Recovery Officer's Action Is Time-Barred Under Rule 68B of Second Schedule.

The petitioner, a 60-year-old Indian citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash and set aside the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Decides Regular First Appeal Arising from Dismissal of Suit for Declaration of Property Ownership. Property Originally Allotted to a Swamiji Under Mysore Government Scheme and Later Subject to Litigation Over Inheritance and Alleged Fraud.

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a suit for declaration of ownership of immovable property situated in Bangalore. The original plaintiff, C.R. H...